From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/netfront: improve truesize tracking Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:33:43 -0800 Message-ID: <50D4AB87.8050601@hp.com> References: <1355838711-5473-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <1355843525.9380.18.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1355844398.14620.254.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <55633610.20121219123427@eikelenboom.it> <1355933869.21834.13.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1797374383.20121220135139@eikelenboom.it> <1356017968.21834.2859.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1609010645.20121221122100@eikelenboom.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Dumazet , Ian Campbell , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , annie li , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" To: Sander Eikelenboom Return-path: Received: from g4t0016.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.19]:20150 "EHLO g4t0016.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751949Ab2LUSdq (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2012 13:33:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1609010645.20121221122100@eikelenboom.it> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I'm guessing that trusize checks matter more on the "inbound" path than the outbound path? If that is indeed the case, then instead of, or in addition to using the -s option to set the local (netperf side) socket buffer size, you should use a -S option to set the remote (netserver side) socket buffer size. happy benchmarking, rick jones