From: Stephan Gatzka <stephan.gatzka@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: IPv6 over Firewire
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 19:33:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50D5FCEA.9060406@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121222101521.08c783ac@stein>
>
> You could add another case to include/net/ndisc.h::ndisc_addr_option_pad()
> with a hardcoded size, couldn't you?
>
No, I think that is almost certainly not a good idea. The address space
option is handed over to the firewire_net driver like this:
type, length, soure/target link address (GUID)
If I add another case in ndisc_addr_option_pad() I think the option will
look like this:
pad, type, length, soure/target link address (GUID)
Because pad, type and GUID are already at the correct position for the
3146 link layer option. So with padding I have to copy them to the
correct position.
All I need is some (8 bytes) of additional tail room in the ndisc skb.
This could be achieved either by specifying needed_tailroom in the
firewire netdevice struct at the expense that now every skb allocated
might get 8 bytes more allocated.
The second option is yoshfuji suggestion to pimp ndisc_opt_addr_space a
bit. His solution only allocates additional memory for ndisc packets at
the expense to introduce a dependency to the struct
ndisc_opt_ieee1394_llinfo.
These are the two option we can go for. Personally I think reserving a
bit more tail room looks cleaner if nobody votes against it...
Regards,
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-22 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-21 17:03 IPv6 over Firewire Stephan Gatzka
2012-12-21 17:53 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2012-12-21 18:39 ` Stephan Gatzka
2012-12-21 19:49 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2012-12-21 23:12 ` Stefan Richter
2012-12-22 6:03 ` Stephan Gatzka
2012-12-22 6:10 ` Stephan Gatzka
2012-12-22 9:15 ` Stefan Richter
2012-12-22 18:33 ` Stephan Gatzka [this message]
2012-12-23 8:23 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2012-12-23 11:13 ` Stephan Gatzka
2012-12-23 12:09 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2012-12-23 13:25 ` Stephan Gatzka
2012-12-23 17:09 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2012-12-23 18:25 ` Stephan Gatzka
2012-12-23 19:38 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2012-12-23 23:52 ` Stefan Richter
[not found] <50EF1AEB.1080704@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <50EFE095.2040505@linux-ipv6.org>
[not found] ` <50F10C53.4000803@gmail.com>
2013-01-12 8:27 ` IPv6 over firewire Stefan Richter
[not found] ` <20130110210912.09c62d38@stein>
[not found] ` <50F10E94.9090302@gmail.com>
2013-01-12 9:24 ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-12 10:54 ` Stephan Gatzka
2013-01-12 13:57 ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-12 14:37 ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-12 14:42 ` Stephan Gatzka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50D5FCEA.9060406@gmail.com \
--to=stephan.gatzka@gmail.com \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).