From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Zealey Subject: Re: UDP multi-core performance on a single socket and SO_REUSEPORT Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 21:46:45 +0000 Message-ID: <50E74DC5.10505@markandruth.co.uk> References: <50DD6DF1.7080304@markandruth.co.uk> <50E72493.4050406@markandruth.co.uk> <1357328238.1678.2189.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Dumazet , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Tom Herbert Return-path: Received: from mailex.mailcore.me ([94.136.40.61]:59539 "EHLO mailex.mailcore.me" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754519Ab3ADVqw (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:46:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/01/13 20:47, Tom Herbert wrote: > I believe the hard part of making SO_REUSEPORT was on the TCP side in > dealing with state in req structs which we have not resolved. UDP > SO_REUSEPORT seems to be working pretty well. Does anyone have a SO_REUSEPORT UDP patch for a modern networking stack? There have been a number of changes and new functions added since the 2010 patch that I found so I couldn't get it to work properly on 3.7.1. Thanks, Mark