Re: xen-netback notify DomU to send ARP.

[Jason Luan <luanjianhai@163.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2907 bytes --]

于 2013年01月09日 20:03, Ian Campbell 写道:
> On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 01:07 +0000, Jason Luan wrote:
>> 于 2013年01月09日 00:00, Ian Campbell 写道:
>>> On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 15:40 +0000, jianhai luan wrote:
>>>> On 2013-1-8 21:42, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 13:13 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 08.01.13 at 12:57, jianhai luan <jianhai.luan@oracle.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> When Xen Dom0's network circumstance changed, DomU
>>>>>>> should be notified in some special condition. For
>>>>>>> example the below circumstance:
>>>>>>> ping from Guest A to DomU:
>>>>>>> Guest A --> eth0 - bond0 - xenbr0 --VIF(DOMU)
>>>>>>> eth1 /
>>>>>>> when eth0 inactive, and eth1 active.
>>>>> How is eth0 failing? Are you unplugging it, un-enslaving it or
>>>>> taking
>>>>> some other sort of administrative action?
>>>> In my emulation environment, i unplug it or ifdown the interface,
>>> I expect these would behave rather different, since the affect of
>>> ifdown
>>> looks rather different to an unplug from the PoV of the switch.
>>>
>>> Is the ifdown case something which you are trying to solve or just what
>>> appeared to be a convenient test case? I'd be less inclined to worry
>>> about explict admin actions such as that.
>>>
>>> Unplugging the cable should cause:
>>>
>> I do above listed thing to let switch active slave only.
>> I think that we should put attention on the thing which bond switch
>> active slave interface in active-backup mode. In network circumstance,
>> many thing will cause the switch, what do Vif when the event happen?
> Sorry, I'm having a bit of trouble parsing the above, but are you asking
> what the VIF should do when the active slave in the bond changes without
> the previously active slave actually failing?
sorry for your misunderstanding.
>
> The issue is that traffic will continue to arrive on the now inactive
> slave, but will be discarded (the expected behaviour for
> Active/Passive)?
Yes. the traffic will continue to arrive on the switcher's port which
connected the inactive
slave before, and the switcher's port don't connect (or don't reach) the
inactive slave now,
so the link will be disconnected before DomU send ARP. After DomU send
ARP, the traffic will
know how to reach the correct switcher's port which connected with the
active slave.
>
> Is this something which happens in practice? Does the active slave
> change even while it remains a viable path?
Yes, please think the below the scene.
PC -- switcher
port A -- eth0 --bond0 --xenbr0 -DomU
port B -- eth1/
or
PC -- switcher A -- eth0 -- bond0 -- xenbr0 -- DomU
\- switcher B -- eth1 /

If Port A or switcher A wrong, the traffic from PC to DomU will be
disconnected before found
correct path (port B or Switcher B ).
>
> Ian.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 6594 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel