From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: do not create neighbor entries for local delivery Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:17:40 -0200 Message-ID: <50F7DDD4.7000503@redhat.com> References: <50F6ABCA.4020804@redhat.com> <20130116.162813.1734293658687337225.davem@davemloft.net> Reply-To: mleitner@redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller , yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:6330 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751944Ab3AQLRo (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2013 06:17:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20130116.162813.1734293658687337225.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em 16-01-2013 19:28, David Miller escreveu: > From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner > Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:31:54 -0200 > >> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c >> index >> 7c34c01b515b7ac370f8021ba6f5ec4c654e9e41..b63e33bcbdfbc1bd78af0b98ffc2d211805214ea >> 100644 > > Patch corrupted by your email client. Doh, really sorry about that. > Note also that YOSHIFUJI Hideaki's patches to remove the cached neighbour > entirely from ipv6 routes will have the same effect, so your patch won't > be needed. Yes but seems it needs some time yet. Mind if I submit it again (right this time)? Thanks, Marcelo.