netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
	Jamie Parsons <Jamie.Parsons@metaswitch.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: refactor sctp_outq_teardown to insure proper re-initalization
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 17:48:20 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F87FB4.3070604@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358457308-6407-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com>

On 01/17/2013 04:15 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> Jamie Parsons reported a problem recently, in which the re-initalization of an
> association (The duplicate init case), resulted in a loss of receive window
> space.  He tracked down the root cause to sctp_outq_teardown, which discarded
> all the data on an outq during a re-initalization of the corresponding
> association, but never reset the outq->outstanding_data field to zero.  I wrote,
> and he tested this fix, which does a proper full re-initalization of the outq,
> fixing this problem, and hopefully future proofing us from simmilar issues down
> the road.
>

Good find.

Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>

-vlad

> Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
> Reported-by: Jamie Parsons <Jamie.Parsons@metaswitch.com>
> Tested-by: Jamie Parsons <Jamie.Parsons@metaswitch.com>
> CC: Jamie Parsons <Jamie.Parsons@metaswitch.com>
> CC: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>   net/sctp/outqueue.c | 12 ++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/outqueue.c b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> index 379c81d..9bcdbd0 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/outqueue.c
> @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ void sctp_outq_init(struct sctp_association *asoc, struct sctp_outq *q)
>
>   /* Free the outqueue structure and any related pending chunks.
>    */
> -void sctp_outq_teardown(struct sctp_outq *q)
> +static void __sctp_outq_teardown(struct sctp_outq *q)
>   {
>   	struct sctp_transport *transport;
>   	struct list_head *lchunk, *temp;
> @@ -277,8 +277,6 @@ void sctp_outq_teardown(struct sctp_outq *q)
>   		sctp_chunk_free(chunk);
>   	}
>
> -	q->error = 0;
> -
>   	/* Throw away any leftover control chunks. */
>   	list_for_each_entry_safe(chunk, tmp, &q->control_chunk_list, list) {
>   		list_del_init(&chunk->list);
> @@ -286,11 +284,17 @@ void sctp_outq_teardown(struct sctp_outq *q)
>   	}
>   }
>
> +void sctp_outq_teardown(struct sctp_outq *q)
> +{
> +	__sctp_outq_teardown(q);
> +	sctp_outq_init(q->asoc, q);
> +}
> +
>   /* Free the outqueue structure and any related pending chunks.  */
>   void sctp_outq_free(struct sctp_outq *q)
>   {
>   	/* Throw away leftover chunks. */
> -	sctp_outq_teardown(q);
> +	__sctp_outq_teardown(q);
>
>   	/* If we were kmalloc()'d, free the memory.  */
>   	if (q->malloced)
>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-17 22:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-17 21:15 [PATCH] sctp: refactor sctp_outq_teardown to insure proper re-initalization Neil Horman
2013-01-17 22:48 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2013-01-17 23:40   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50F87FB4.3070604@gmail.com \
    --to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jamie.Parsons@metaswitch.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).