From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
To: stephan.gatzka@gmail.com
Cc: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC:] struct net_device_ops: Add function pointer to fill device specific ndisc information
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 03:47:13 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FC3BB1.4070005@linux-ipv6.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50FC2EE4.3080705@gmail.com>
Stephan Gatzka wrote:
> I've implemented IPv6 over firewire. Right now I'm facing the problem that the corresponding RFC3146 requires very firewire specific information sent during neighborhood discovery.
>
> There was already a discussion on the linux1394 mailing list (http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=30342089 and http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=50E4A3E5.8080304%40gmail.com&forum_name=linux1394-devel)
>
> During that discussion all participants agreed that it makes no sense to introduce a dependency between the ndisc code and the firewire net driver.
>
> So the most appealing option seems to be to introduce on more callback routine either in struct net_device or struct net_device_ops:
>
> int (*ndo_fill_llao)(void *llao);
>
> Because I'm not so familiar with the structure of the whole network infrastructure in Linux, I need some advice if struct net_device or struct net_device_ops is the right place.
>
> Maybe it's worth to generalize this and do the same for IPv4/ARP because right now the ARP packets are mangled in the firewire net driver.
>
> Nevertheless, I've to admit that right now it seems that only IPv6 over firewire requires such a callback routine.
My current position is to change "mac address" to
struct fwnet_hwaddr {
u8 guid[8];
u8 max_rec;
u8 sspd;
u8 fifo[6];
};
Benefits:
[ARP and NDISC]
- both can be handled in more natural way.
-- You will not need to mangle those packets when
sending/receiving.
-- You do not need to inspect ARP/NDISC packet.
By using netevent notification mechanism, you can
learn peer parameters.
-- IP layer is not required to change very much.
[Multicast]
-it can be handled in more natural way.
-- MCAP (Multicast Channel Allocation Protocol) needs to
know full IP multicast address.
-- We have IP multicast address => "hardware address"
mapping for each L2 type in IP layer.
-- We expect that IP layer can request net_device to
receive multicast stream for some multicast address
via corresponding "hardware address".
-- This means that we need to have "hardware address"
of 128bits (16 octets) or more.
-- By increasing size of dev->dev_addr, we can embedded
full IPv6 address in it.
--yoshfuji
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-20 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-20 17:52 [RFC:] struct net_device_ops: Add function pointer to fill device specific ndisc information Stephan Gatzka
2013-01-20 18:47 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki [this message]
2013-01-20 21:23 ` Stephan Gatzka
2013-01-21 2:29 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-21 6:25 ` Stephan Gatzka
2013-01-21 7:39 ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-21 11:50 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-21 19:25 ` Stephan Gatzka
2013-01-21 19:57 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-21 21:16 ` Stephan Gatzka
2013-01-27 14:43 ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-27 17:21 ` Stephan Gatzka
2013-01-27 18:20 ` Stephan Gatzka
2013-01-27 18:25 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-27 19:28 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-27 23:26 ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-21 11:50 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-21 8:09 ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-21 12:04 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-21 13:15 ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-21 6:37 ` Stephan Gatzka
2013-01-21 12:16 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-20 21:22 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2013-01-21 6:17 ` Stephan Gatzka
2013-01-21 8:28 ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-21 12:32 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-21 14:15 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50FC3BB1.4070005@linux-ipv6.org \
--to=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephan.gatzka@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).