From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Rate Limitation of Router Reachability Probing for possible dead routers (is Re: ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in rt6_probe().)
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 04:28:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FD96E4.1020607@linux-ipv6.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50FD8BC6.1030509@linux-ipv6.org>
(2013年01月22日 03:41), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
> (2013年01月22日 03:28), Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> Hello YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明,
>>
>> This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
>>
>> The patch 2152caea7196: "ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in
>> rt6_probe()." from Jan 17, 2013, leads to the following Smatch
>> complaint:
>>
>> net/ipv6/route.c:495 rt6_probe()
>> error: we previously assumed 'neigh' could be null (see line 490)
>>
>> net/ipv6/route.c
>> 489
>> 490 if (!neigh ||
>> ^^^^^
>> New test.
>>
>> 491 time_after(jiffies, neigh->updated + rt->rt6i_idev->cnf.rtr_probe_interval)) {
>> 492 struct in6_addr mcaddr;
>> 493 struct in6_addr *target;
>> 494
>> 495 neigh->updated = jiffies;
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Old dereference.
>>
>> 496
>> 497 if (neigh)
>> ^^^^^
>> Another new test.
>
> Oh, right, I'll fix. Thanks!
Ok, fix is easy, but in fact, we have broken router reachability
probing.
Here rt->n was neighbour entry for (unreachable) router.
The specification says, we SHOUDLD probe such router, but we
should have some rate limit (once per minute, or so).
We used "rt->n->updated" for this purpose, but now, if NS failed,
we may immediately removes neighbour entry for it. So,
we might continue sending NS to dead router every 1 second.
Any ideas?
--yoshfuji
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-21 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-21 18:28 ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in rt6_probe() Dan Carpenter
2013-01-21 18:41 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-21 19:28 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki [this message]
2013-01-21 20:44 ` Rate Limitation of Router Reachability Probing for possible dead routers (is Re: ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in rt6_probe().) David Miller
2013-01-22 3:47 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-22 5:49 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50FD96E4.1020607@linux-ipv6.org \
--to=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).