netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Rate Limitation of Router Reachability Probing for possible dead routers (is Re: ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in rt6_probe().)
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 04:28:36 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FD96E4.1020607@linux-ipv6.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50FD8BC6.1030509@linux-ipv6.org>

(2013年01月22日 03:41), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote:
> (2013年01月22日 03:28), Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> Hello YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明,
>>
>> This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
>>
>> The patch 2152caea7196: "ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in 
>> rt6_probe()." from Jan 17, 2013, leads to the following Smatch 
>> complaint:
>>
>> net/ipv6/route.c:495 rt6_probe()
>> 	 error: we previously assumed 'neigh' could be null (see line 490)
>>
>> net/ipv6/route.c
>>    489	
>>    490		if (!neigh ||
>>                      ^^^^^
>> New test.
>>
>>    491		    time_after(jiffies, neigh->updated + rt->rt6i_idev->cnf.rtr_probe_interval)) {
>>    492			struct in6_addr mcaddr;
>>    493			struct in6_addr *target;
>>    494	
>>    495			neigh->updated = jiffies;
>>                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> Old dereference.
>>
>>    496	
>>    497			if (neigh)
>>                             ^^^^^
>> Another new test.
> 
> Oh, right, I'll fix.  Thanks!

Ok, fix is easy, but in fact, we have broken router reachability
probing.

Here rt->n was neighbour entry for (unreachable) router.
The specification says, we SHOUDLD probe such router, but we
should  have some rate limit (once per minute, or so).

We used "rt->n->updated" for this purpose, but now, if NS failed,
we may immediately removes neighbour entry for it.  So,
we might continue sending NS to dead router every 1 second.

Any ideas?

--yoshfuji

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-21 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-21 18:28 ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in rt6_probe() Dan Carpenter
2013-01-21 18:41 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-21 19:28   ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki [this message]
2013-01-21 20:44     ` Rate Limitation of Router Reachability Probing for possible dead routers (is Re: ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in rt6_probe().) David Miller
2013-01-22  3:47       ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-01-22  5:49         ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50FD96E4.1020607@linux-ipv6.org \
    --to=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).