From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"therbert@google.com" <therbert@google.com>,
"ycai@google.com" <ycai@google.com>,
"eric.dumazet@gmail.com" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 10/10] ixgbe: Add support for set_channels ethtool operation
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:31:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <510064D5.2020905@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358976045.2658.18.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
On 01/23/2013 01:20 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 16:30 +0000, Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 16:19 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 10:58 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>>> This change adds support for the ethtool set_channels operation.
>>>>
>>>> Since the ixgbe driver has to support DCB as well as the other modes the
>>>> assumption I made here is that the number of channels in DCB modes refers
>>>> to the number of queues per traffic class, not the number of queues total.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
>>> In DCB mode are there separate IRQs for the different classes?
>> Yes. The Rx packet buffer is split into multiple packet buffers, one
>> for each online class. After that, it's just queues assigned to the
>> packet buffers, and interrupts assigned however you want them to be.
> Right, I think we've been through this before. And I can see how it
> would be more useful for users to specify number of RX queues per
> priority level. But that's not what was specified...
>
> I'm afraid the 'channels' ethtool operations have turned into a mess...
> I can't see how to get to a reasonable generic definition of what they
> should do.
>
> Ben.
Actually it looks like most of the drivers (I looked at bnx, bnx2x, tg3,
and qlcnic) are using the set_queues call in a similar way. What they
end up doing is using the value and plugging it into their TSS/RSS
fields in their private structures. From what I can tell in
bnx2x_setup_tc they may do exactly the same thing we are currently doing
for DCB since they use the BNX2X_NUM_ETH_QUEUES value that they set in
their set_channels call to set the number of queues they use per traffic
class. I would say the usage is actually pretty consistent between
bnx2x and ixgbe based on this, even if it isn't exactly correct.
For now I would say all of the drivers are using the set_channels
operation to specify the number of Tx/Rx queues, or queue pairs per
traffic class. So for non-DCB NICs this means it is setting exactly
that number of queues, and for DCB capable nics it means num_tcs times
the specified number of queues.
Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-23 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-10 18:56 [PATCH v2 00/10] Make XPS usable within ixgbe Alexander Duyck
2013-01-10 18:56 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] net: Split core bits of netdev_pick_tx into __netdev_pick_tx Alexander Duyck
2013-01-10 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] net: Add functions netif_reset_xps_queue and netif_set_xps_queue Alexander Duyck
2013-01-10 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] net: Rewrite netif_reset_xps_queue to allow for better code reuse Alexander Duyck
2013-01-10 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] net: Rewrite netif_set_xps_queues to address several issues Alexander Duyck
2013-01-10 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] net: Add support for XPS without sysfs being defined Alexander Duyck
2013-01-10 18:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/10] ixgbe: Define FCoE and Flow director limits much sooner to allow for changes Alexander Duyck
2013-01-10 18:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/10] ixgbe: Add function for setting XPS queue mapping Alexander Duyck
2013-01-10 18:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/10] ixgbe: Update ixgbe driver to use __netdev_pick_tx in ixgbe_select_queue Alexander Duyck
2013-01-10 18:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/10] ixgbe: Add support for displaying the number of Tx/Rx channels Alexander Duyck
2013-01-10 18:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/10] ixgbe: Add support for set_channels ethtool operation Alexander Duyck
2013-01-16 16:19 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-01-16 16:30 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2013-01-23 21:20 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-01-23 22:31 ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2013-01-23 23:48 ` John Fastabend
2013-01-17 0:35 ` Alexander Duyck
2013-01-11 6:47 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] Make XPS usable within ixgbe David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=510064D5.2020905@intel.com \
--to=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com \
--cc=therbert@google.com \
--cc=ycai@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).