From: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/3] virtio-net: split out clean affinity function
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 12:20:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51020800.4080900@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5101FBE0.7040505@redhat.com>
On 01/25/2013 11:28 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 01/21/2013 07:25 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>> Split out the clean affinity function to virtnet_clean_affinity().
>>
>> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
>> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@gmail.com>
>> Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
>> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> V5->V6: NEW
>>
>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> index 70cd957..1a35a8c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -1016,48 +1016,57 @@ static int virtnet_vlan_rx_kill_vid(struct net_device *dev, u16 vid)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void virtnet_set_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi, bool set)
>> +static void virtnet_clean_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi, long hcpu)
>> {
>> int i;
>> int cpu;
>>
>> - /* In multiqueue mode, when the number of cpu is equal to the number of
>> - * queue pairs, we let the queue pairs to be private to one cpu by
>> - * setting the affinity hint to eliminate the contention.
>> - */
>> - if ((vi->curr_queue_pairs == 1 ||
>> - vi->max_queue_pairs != num_online_cpus()) && set) {
>> - if (vi->affinity_hint_set)
>> - set = false;
>> - else
>> - return;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (set) {
>> - i = 0;
>> - for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>> - virtqueue_/set_affinity(vi->rq[i].vq, cpu);
>> - virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->sq[i].vq, cpu);
>> - *per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, cpu) = i;
>> - i++;
>> - }
>> -
>> - vi->affinity_hint_set = true;
>> - } else {
>> - for(i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> + if (vi->affinity_hint_set) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>> virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->rq[i].vq, -1);
>> virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->sq[i].vq, -1);
>> }
>>
>> i = 0;
>> - for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
>> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>> + if (cpu == hcpu)
>> + continue;
>> *per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, cpu) =
>> ++i % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
>> + }
>>
>
> Some questions here:
>
> - Did we need reset the affinity of the queue here like the this?
>
> virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->sq[*per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, hcpu)], -1);
> virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->rq[*per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, hcpu)], -1);
I think no, we are going to unset the affinity of all the set queues,
include hcpu.
>
> - Looks like we need also reset the percpu index when
> vi->affinity_hint_set is false.
Yes, follow this and the comment on [1/3].
> - Does this really need this reset? Consider we're going to reset the
> percpu in CPU_DEAD?
I think resetting when CPU_DOWN_PREPARE can avoid selecting the wrong queue
on the dying CPU.
Thanks,
Wanlong Gao
>
> Thanks
>> vi->affinity_hint_set = false;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +static void virtnet_set_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> + int cpu;
>> +
>> + /* In multiqueue mode, when the number of cpu is equal to the number of
>> + * queue pairs, we let the queue pairs to be private to one cpu by
>> + * setting the affinity hint to eliminate the contention.
>> + */
>> + if (vi->curr_queue_pairs == 1 ||
>> + vi->max_queue_pairs != num_online_cpus()) {
>> + if (vi->affinity_hint_set)
>> + virtnet_clean_affinity(vi, -1);
>> + else
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + i = 0;
>> + for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>> + virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->rq[i].vq, cpu);
>> + virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->sq[i].vq, cpu);
>> + *per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, cpu) = i;
>> + i++;
>> + }
>> +
>> + vi->affinity_hint_set = true;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void virtnet_get_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
>> struct ethtool_ringparam *ring)
>> {
>> @@ -1105,7 +1114,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_channels(struct net_device *dev,
>> netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(dev, queue_pairs);
>>
>> get_online_cpus();
>> - virtnet_set_affinity(vi, true);
>> + virtnet_set_affinity(vi);
>> put_online_cpus();
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1274,7 +1283,7 @@ static void virtnet_del_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>> {
>> struct virtio_device *vdev = vi->vdev;
>>
>> - virtnet_set_affinity(vi, false);
>> + virtnet_clean_affinity(vi, -1);
>>
>> vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
>>
>> @@ -1398,7 +1407,7 @@ static int init_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>> goto err_free;
>>
>> get_online_cpus();
>> - virtnet_set_affinity(vi, true);
>> + virtnet_set_affinity(vi);
>> put_online_cpus();
>>
>> return 0;
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-25 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-21 11:25 [PATCH V6 1/3] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive Wanlong Gao
2013-01-21 11:25 ` [PATCH V6 2/3] virtio-net: split out clean affinity function Wanlong Gao
2013-01-25 3:28 ` Jason Wang
2013-01-25 4:20 ` Wanlong Gao [this message]
2013-01-25 5:13 ` Jason Wang
2013-01-25 5:40 ` Wanlong Gao
2013-01-25 6:12 ` Jason Wang
2013-01-25 6:42 ` Wanlong Gao
2013-01-25 7:04 ` Jason Wang
2013-01-25 7:22 ` Wanlong Gao
2013-01-21 11:25 ` [PATCH V6 3/3] virtio-net: reset virtqueue affinity when doing cpu hotplug Wanlong Gao
2013-01-22 1:12 ` [PATCH V6 1/3] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive Rusty Russell
2013-01-24 2:28 ` Wanlong Gao
2013-01-24 17:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-01-25 3:26 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51020800.4080900@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=erdnetdev@gmail.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).