netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 1/3] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:11:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51024C3A.6080200@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51024AC7.9030109@cn.fujitsu.com>

On 01/25/2013 05:05 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> On 01/25/2013 05:00 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 01/25/2013 04:36 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>>> As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very
>>> well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug.
>>> Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable
>>> to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue.
>>>
>>> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
>>> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
>>> Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
>>> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> V6->V7:
>>> 	serialize virtnet_set_queues to avoid a race with cpu hotplug (Jason)
>>> V5->V6:
>>> 	remove {get|put}_online_cpus from virtnet_del_vqs (Jason)
>>> V4->V5:
>>> 	Add get/put_online_cpus to avoid CPUs go up and down during operations (Rusty)
>>>
>>> V3->V4:
>>> 	move vq_index into virtnet_info	(Jason)
>>> 	change the mapping value when not setting affinity (Jason)
>>> 	address the comments about select_queue (Rusty)
>>>
>>>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>>  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>> index a6fcf15..0f3afa8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
>>> @@ -123,6 +123,9 @@ struct virtnet_info {
>>>  
>>>  	/* Does the affinity hint is set for virtqueues? */
>>>  	bool affinity_hint_set;
>>> +
>>> +	/* Per-cpu variable to show the mapping from CPU to virtqueue */
>>> +	int __percpu *vq_index;
>>>  };
>>>  
>>>  struct skb_vnet_hdr {
>>> @@ -1016,6 +1019,7 @@ static int virtnet_vlan_rx_kill_vid(struct net_device *dev, u16 vid)
>>>  static void virtnet_set_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi, bool set)
>>>  {
>>>  	int i;
>>> +	int cpu;
>>>  
>>>  	/* In multiqueue mode, when the number of cpu is equal to the number of
>>>  	 * queue pairs, we let the queue pairs to be private to one cpu by
>>> @@ -1029,16 +1033,29 @@ static void virtnet_set_affinity(struct virtnet_info *vi, bool set)
>>>  			return;
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>> -	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>>> -		int cpu = set ? i : -1;
>>> -		virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->rq[i].vq, cpu);
>>> -		virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->sq[i].vq, cpu);
>>> -	}
>>> +	if (set) {
>>> +		i = 0;
>>> +		for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>>> +			virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->rq[i].vq, cpu);
>>> +			virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->sq[i].vq, cpu);
>>> +			*per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, cpu) = i;
>>> +			i++;
>>> +		}
>>>  
>>> -	if (set)
>>>  		vi->affinity_hint_set = true;
>>> -	else
>>> +	} else {
>>> +		for(i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>>> +			virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->rq[i].vq, -1);
>>> +			virtqueue_set_affinity(vi->sq[i].vq, -1);
>>> +		}
>>> +
>>> +		i = 0;
>>> +		for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
>>> +			*per_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index, cpu) =
>>> +				++i % vi->curr_queue_pairs;
>>> +
>>>  		vi->affinity_hint_set = false;
>>> +	}
>>>  }
>> Sorry, looks like the issue of v6 still exists, we need set per-cpu
>> index unconditionally here (and also in 2/3), the cpus != queues check
>> may bypass this setting.
> This fixed in 2/3, when cpus != queues, it will go into virtnet_clean_affinity(in 2/3),
> then vq index is set in virtnet_clean_affinity. Am I missing something?

Ah, so 2/3 looks fine. I suggest to fix this in 1/3 since it's not good
to introduce a bug in patch 1 and fix it in patch 2, and this can also
confuse the bisect.

Thanks
> Thanks,
> Wanlong Gao
>
>>>  
>>>  static void virtnet_get_ringparam(struct net_device *dev,
>>> @@ -1082,6 +1099,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_channels(struct net_device *dev,
>>>  	if (queue_pairs > vi->max_queue_pairs)
>>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>>  
>>> +	get_online_cpus();
>>>  	err = virtnet_set_queues(vi, queue_pairs);
>>>  	if (!err) {
>>>  		netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(dev, queue_pairs);
>>> @@ -1089,6 +1107,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_channels(struct net_device *dev,
>>>  
>>>  		virtnet_set_affinity(vi, true);
>>>  	}
>>> +	put_online_cpus();
>>>  
>>>  	return err;
>>>  }
>>> @@ -1127,12 +1146,19 @@ static int virtnet_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
>>>  
>>>  /* To avoid contending a lock hold by a vcpu who would exit to host, select the
>>>   * txq based on the processor id.
>>> - * TODO: handle cpu hotplug.
>>>   */
>>>  static u16 virtnet_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>>  {
>>> -	int txq = skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb) ? skb_get_rx_queue(skb) :
>>> -		  smp_processor_id();
>>> +	int txq;
>>> +	struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
>>> +
>>> +	if (skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb)) {
>>> +		txq = skb_get_rx_queue(skb);
>>> +	} else {
>>> +		txq = *__this_cpu_ptr(vi->vq_index);
>>> +		if (txq == -1)
>>> +			txq = 0;
>>> +	}
>>>  
>>>  	while (unlikely(txq >= dev->real_num_tx_queues))
>>>  		txq -= dev->real_num_tx_queues;
>>> @@ -1371,7 +1397,10 @@ static int init_vqs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
>>>  	if (ret)
>>>  		goto err_free;
>>>  
>>> +	get_online_cpus();
>>>  	virtnet_set_affinity(vi, true);
>>> +	put_online_cpus();
>>> +
>>>  	return 0;
>>>  
>>>  err_free:
>>> @@ -1453,6 +1482,10 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>>>  	if (vi->stats == NULL)
>>>  		goto free;
>>>  
>>> +	vi->vq_index = alloc_percpu(int);
>>> +	if (vi->vq_index == NULL)
>>> +		goto free_stats;
>>> +
>>>  	mutex_init(&vi->config_lock);
>>>  	vi->config_enable = true;
>>>  	INIT_WORK(&vi->config_work, virtnet_config_changed_work);
>>> @@ -1476,7 +1509,7 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>>>  	/* Allocate/initialize the rx/tx queues, and invoke find_vqs */
>>>  	err = init_vqs(vi);
>>>  	if (err)
>>> -		goto free_stats;
>>> +		goto free_index;
>>>  
>>>  	netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(dev, 1);
>>>  	netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(dev, 1);
>>> @@ -1520,6 +1553,8 @@ free_recv_bufs:
>>>  free_vqs:
>>>  	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
>>>  	virtnet_del_vqs(vi);
>>> +free_index:
>>> +	free_percpu(vi->vq_index);
>>>  free_stats:
>>>  	free_percpu(vi->stats);
>>>  free:
>>> @@ -1554,6 +1589,7 @@ static void virtnet_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>>>  
>>>  	flush_work(&vi->config_work);
>>>  
>>> +	free_percpu(vi->vq_index);
>>>  	free_percpu(vi->stats);
>>>  	free_netdev(vi->dev);
>>>  }
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-25  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-25  8:36 [PATCH V7 1/3] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive Wanlong Gao
2013-01-25  8:36 ` [PATCH V7 2/3] virtio-net: split out clean affinity function Wanlong Gao
2013-01-25  8:36 ` [PATCH V7 3/3] virtio-net: reset virtqueue affinity when doing cpu hotplug Wanlong Gao
2013-01-25  9:00 ` [PATCH V7 1/3] virtio-net: fix the set affinity bug when CPU IDs are not consecutive Jason Wang
2013-01-25  9:05   ` Wanlong Gao
2013-01-25  9:11     ` Jason Wang [this message]
2013-01-25  9:16       ` Wanlong Gao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51024C3A.6080200@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=erdnetdev@gmail.com \
    --cc=gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).