From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Chen Ridong <chenridong@huaweicloud.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Gabriele Monaco" <gmonaco@redhat.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Lai Jiangshan" <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
"Marco Crivellari" <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Muchun Song" <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Phil Auld" <pauld@redhat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Roman Gushchin" <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
"Shakeel Butt" <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>, "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/33] sched/isolation: Convert housekeeping cpumasks to rcu pointers
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 00:03:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <510b0185-51d6-44e6-8c39-dfc4c1721e03@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb9a75dc-8c34-41da-b064-e31bf5fe6cb2@huaweicloud.com>
On 10/20/25 9:46 PM, Chen Ridong wrote:
>
> On 2025/10/14 4:31, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> HK_TYPE_DOMAIN's cpumask will soon be made modifyable by cpuset.
>> A synchronization mechanism is then needed to synchronize the updates
>> with the housekeeping cpumask readers.
>>
>> Turn the housekeeping cpumasks into RCU pointers. Once a housekeeping
>> cpumask will be modified, the update side will wait for an RCU grace
>> period and propagate the change to interested subsystem when deemed
>> necessary.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/isolation.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
>> index 8690fb705089..b46c20b5437f 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
>> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(housekeeping_overridden);
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_overridden);
>>
>> struct housekeeping {
>> - cpumask_var_t cpumasks[HK_TYPE_MAX];
>> + struct cpumask __rcu *cpumasks[HK_TYPE_MAX];
>> unsigned long flags;
>> };
>>
>> @@ -33,17 +33,28 @@ bool housekeeping_enabled(enum hk_type type)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_enabled);
>>
>> +const struct cpumask *housekeeping_cpumask(enum hk_type type)
>> +{
>> + if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden)) {
>> + if (housekeeping.flags & BIT(type)) {
>> + return rcu_dereference_check(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], 1);
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return cpu_possible_mask;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_cpumask);
>> +
>> int housekeeping_any_cpu(enum hk_type type)
>> {
>> int cpu;
>>
>> if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden)) {
>> if (housekeeping.flags & BIT(type)) {
>> - cpu = sched_numa_find_closest(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], smp_processor_id());
>> + cpu = sched_numa_find_closest(housekeeping_cpumask(type), smp_processor_id());
>> if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
>> return cpu;
>>
>> - cpu = cpumask_any_and_distribute(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], cpu_online_mask);
>> + cpu = cpumask_any_and_distribute(housekeeping_cpumask(type), cpu_online_mask);
>> if (likely(cpu < nr_cpu_ids))
>> return cpu;
>> /*
>> @@ -59,28 +70,18 @@ int housekeeping_any_cpu(enum hk_type type)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_any_cpu);
>>
>> -const struct cpumask *housekeeping_cpumask(enum hk_type type)
>> -{
>> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden))
>> - if (housekeeping.flags & BIT(type))
>> - return housekeeping.cpumasks[type];
>> - return cpu_possible_mask;
>> -}
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_cpumask);
>> -
>> void housekeeping_affine(struct task_struct *t, enum hk_type type)
>> {
>> if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden))
>> if (housekeeping.flags & BIT(type))
>> - set_cpus_allowed_ptr(t, housekeeping.cpumasks[type]);
>> + set_cpus_allowed_ptr(t, housekeeping_cpumask(type));
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_affine);
>>
>> bool housekeeping_test_cpu(int cpu, enum hk_type type)
>> {
>> - if (static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden))
>> - if (housekeeping.flags & BIT(type))
>> - return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, housekeeping.cpumasks[type]);
>> + if (housekeeping.flags & BIT(type))
>> + return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, housekeeping_cpumask(type));
>> return true;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(housekeeping_test_cpu);
>> @@ -96,20 +97,33 @@ void __init housekeeping_init(void)
>>
>> if (housekeeping.flags & HK_FLAG_KERNEL_NOISE)
>> sched_tick_offload_init();
>> -
>> + /*
>> + * Realloc with a proper allocator so that any cpumask update
>> + * can indifferently free the old version with kfree().
>> + */
>> for_each_set_bit(type, &housekeeping.flags, HK_TYPE_MAX) {
>> + struct cpumask *omask, *nmask = kmalloc(cpumask_size(), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!nmask))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + omask = rcu_dereference(housekeeping.cpumasks[type]);
>> +
>> /* We need at least one CPU to handle housekeeping work */
>> - WARN_ON_ONCE(cpumask_empty(housekeeping.cpumasks[type]));
>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(cpumask_empty(omask));
>> + cpumask_copy(nmask, omask);
>> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], nmask);
>> + memblock_free(omask, cpumask_size());
>> }
>> }
>>
>> static void __init housekeeping_setup_type(enum hk_type type,
>> cpumask_var_t housekeeping_staging)
>> {
>> + struct cpumask *mask = memblock_alloc_or_panic(cpumask_size(), SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
>>
>> - alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&housekeeping.cpumasks[type]);
>> - cpumask_copy(housekeeping.cpumasks[type],
>> - housekeeping_staging);
>> + cpumask_copy(mask, housekeeping_staging);
>> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], mask);
>> }
>>
>> static int __init housekeeping_setup(char *str, unsigned long flags)
>> @@ -162,7 +176,7 @@ static int __init housekeeping_setup(char *str, unsigned long flags)
>>
>> for_each_set_bit(type, &iter_flags, HK_TYPE_MAX) {
>> if (!cpumask_equal(housekeeping_staging,
>> - housekeeping.cpumasks[type])) {
>> + housekeeping_cpumask(type))) {
>> pr_warn("Housekeeping: nohz_full= must match isolcpus=\n");
>> goto free_housekeeping_staging;
>> }
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
>> index 1f5d07067f60..0c0ef8999fd6 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>> #include <linux/ktime_api.h>
>> #include <linux/lockdep_api.h>
>> #include <linux/lockdep.h>
>> +#include <linux/memblock.h>
>> #include <linux/minmax.h>
>> #include <linux/mm.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
> A warning was detected:
>
> =============================
> WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> 6.17.0-next-20251009-00033-g4444da88969b #808 Not tainted
> -----------------------------
> kernel/sched/isolation.c:60 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
>
> rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
> 1 lock held by swapper/0/1:
> #0: ffff888100600ce0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#3){++++}-{4:4}, at: walk_compone
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.17.0-next-20251009-00033-g4
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0xa0
> lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x148/0x1b0
> housekeeping_cpumask+0xaa/0xb0
> housekeeping_test_cpu+0x25/0x40
> find_get_block_common+0x41/0x3e0
> bdev_getblk+0x28/0xa0
> ext4_getblk+0xba/0x2d0
> ext4_bread_batch+0x56/0x170
> __ext4_find_entry+0x17c/0x410
> ? lock_release+0xc6/0x290
> ext4_lookup+0x7a/0x1d0
> __lookup_slow+0xf9/0x1b0
> walk_component+0xe0/0x150
> link_path_walk+0x201/0x3e0
> path_openat+0xb1/0xb30
> ? stack_depot_save_flags+0x41e/0xa00
> do_filp_open+0xbc/0x170
> ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2c/0x50
> ? __create_object+0x59/0x80
> ? trace_kmem_cache_alloc+0x1d/0xa0
> ? vprintk_emit+0x2b2/0x360
> do_open_execat+0x56/0x100
> alloc_bprm+0x1a/0x200
> ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10
> kernel_execve+0x4b/0x160
> kernel_init+0xe5/0x1c0
> ret_from_fork+0x185/0x1d0
> ? __pfx_kernel_init+0x10/0x10
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
> </TASK>
> random: crng init done
>
It is because bh_lru_install() of fs/buffer.c calls cpu_is_isolated()
without holding a rcu_read_lock. Will need to add a rcu_read_lock() there.
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-21 4:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-13 20:31 [PATCH 00/33 v3] cpuset/isolation: Honour kthreads preferred affinity Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 01/33] PCI: Prepare to protect against concurrent isolated cpuset change Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-14 20:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-31 15:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 02/33] cpu: Revert "cpu/hotplug: Prevent self deadlock on CPU hot-unplug" Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 03/33] memcg: Prepare to protect against concurrent isolated cpuset change Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 04/33] mm: vmstat: " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 05/33] sched/isolation: Save boot defined domain flags Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-23 15:45 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-10-31 15:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 06/33] cpuset: Convert boot_hk_cpus to use HK_TYPE_DOMAIN_BOOT Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 07/33] driver core: cpu: Convert /sys/devices/system/cpu/isolated " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 08/33] net: Keep ignoring isolated cpuset change Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 09/33] block: Protect against concurrent " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 10/33] cpu: Provide lockdep check for CPU hotplug lock write-held Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 11/33] cpuset: Provide lockdep check for cpuset lock held Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-14 13:29 ` Chen Ridong
2025-10-31 16:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-11-03 2:32 ` Chen Ridong
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 12/33] sched/isolation: Convert housekeeping cpumasks to rcu pointers Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-21 1:46 ` Chen Ridong
2025-10-21 1:57 ` Chen Ridong
2025-10-21 4:03 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2025-10-31 16:17 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-31 19:29 ` Waiman Long
2025-11-03 2:22 ` Chen Ridong
2025-10-21 3:49 ` Waiman Long
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 13/33] cpuset: Update HK_TYPE_DOMAIN cpumask from cpuset Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-21 4:10 ` Waiman Long
2025-10-22 1:36 ` Chen Ridong
2025-10-21 13:39 ` Waiman Long
2025-10-31 12:59 ` Phil Auld
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 14/33] sched/isolation: Flush memcg workqueues on cpuset isolated partition change Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-21 19:16 ` Waiman Long
2025-10-21 19:28 ` Waiman Long
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 15/33] sched/isolation: Flush vmstat " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 16/33] PCI: Flush PCI probe workqueue " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-14 20:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 17/33] cpuset: Propagate cpuset isolation update to workqueue through housekeeping Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 18/33] cpuset: Remove cpuset_cpu_is_isolated() Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-29 18:05 ` Waiman Long
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 19/33] sched/isolation: Remove HK_TYPE_TICK test from cpu_is_isolated() Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 20/33] PCI: Remove superfluous HK_TYPE_WQ check Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 21/33] kthread: Refine naming of affinity related fields Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 22/33] kthread: Include unbound kthreads in the managed affinity list Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-21 22:42 ` Waiman Long
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 23/33] kthread: Include kthreadd to " Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 24/33] kthread: Rely on HK_TYPE_DOMAIN for preferred affinity management Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 25/33] sched: Switch the fallback task allowed cpumask to HK_TYPE_DOMAIN Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 26/33] cgroup/cpuset: Fail if isolated and nohz_full don't leave any housekeeping Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 27/33] sched/arm64: Move fallback task cpumask to HK_TYPE_DOMAIN Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 28/33] kthread: Honour kthreads preferred affinity after cpuset changes Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 29/33] kthread: Comment on the purpose and placement of kthread_affine_node() call Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 30/33] kthread: Add API to update preferred affinity on kthread runtime Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-14 12:35 ` Simon Horman
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 31/33] kthread: Document kthread_affine_preferred() Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 32/33] genirq: Correctly handle preferred kthreads affinity Frederic Weisbecker
2025-10-13 20:31 ` [PATCH 33/33] doc: Add housekeeping documentation Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=510b0185-51d6-44e6-8c39-dfc4c1721e03@redhat.com \
--to=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=gmonaco@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).