From: Nikolay Kichukov <nikolay@oldum.net>
To: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
Cc: v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>, Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] remove msize limit in virtio transport
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 11:21:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5111aae45d30df13e42073b0af4f16caf9bc79f0.camel@oldum.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1835287.xbJIPCv9Fc@silver>
Thanks Christian,
It works, sorry for overlooking the 'known limitations' in the first
place. When do we expect these patches to be merged upstream?
Cheers,
-N
On Sat, 2022-01-22 at 14:34 +0100, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2022 23:43:46 CET Nikolay Kichukov wrote:
> > Thanks for the patches. I've applied them on top of 5.16.2 kernel
> > and it
> > works for msize=1048576. Performance-wise, same throughput as the
> > previous patches, basically limiting factor is the backend block
> > storage.
>
> Depends on how you were testing exactly. I assume you just booted a
> guest and
> then mounted a humble 9p directory in guest to perform some isolated
> I/O
> throughput tests on a single file. In this test scenario yes, you
> would not
> see much of a difference between v3 vs. v4 of this series.
>
> However in my tests I went much further than that by running an entire
> guest
> on top of 9p as its root filesystem:
> https://wiki.qemu.org/Documentation/9p_root_fs
> With this 9p rootfs setup you get a completely different picture. For
> instance
> you'll notice with v3 that guest boot time *increases* with rising
> msize,
> whereas with v4 it shrinks. And also when you benchmark throughput on
> a file
> in this 9p rootfs setup with v3 you get worse results than with v4,
> sometimes
> with v3 even worse than without patches at all. With v4 applied though
> it
> clearly outperforms any other kernel version in all aspects.
>
> I highly recommend this 9p rootfs setup as a heterogenous 9p test
> environment,
> as it is a very good real world test scenario for all kinds of
> aspects.
>
> > However, when I mount with msize=4194304, the system locks up upon
> > first
> > try to traverse the directory structure, ie 'ls'. Only solution is
> > to
> > 'poweroff' the guest. Nothing in the logs.
>
> I've described this in detail in the cover letter under "KNOWN
> LIMITATIONS"
> already. Use max. msize 4186112.
>
> > Qemu 6.0.0 on the host has the following patches:
> >
> > 01-fix-wrong-io-block-size-Rgetattr.patch
> > 02-dedupe-iounit-code.patch
> > 03-9pfs-simplify-blksize_to_iounit.patch
>
> I recommend just using QEMU 6.2. It is not worth to patch that old
> QEMU
> version. E.g. you would have a lousy readdir performance with that
> QEMU
> version and what not.
>
> You don't need to install QEMU. You can directly run it from the build
> directory.
>
> > The kernel patches were applied on the guest kernel only.
> >
> > I've generated them with the following command:
> > git diff
> > 783ba37c1566dd715b9a67d437efa3b77e3cd1a7^..8c305df4646b65218978fc647
> > 4aa0f5f
> > 29b216a0 > /tmp/kernel-5.16-9p-virtio-drop-msize-cap.patch
> >
> > The host runs 5.15.4 kernel.
>
> Host kernel version currently does not matter for this series.
>
> Best regards,
> Christian Schoenebeck
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-24 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-30 13:23 [PATCH v4 00/12] remove msize limit in virtio transport Christian Schoenebeck
2021-12-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] net/9p: show error message if user 'msize' cannot be satisfied Christian Schoenebeck
2021-12-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] net/9p: split message size argument into 't_size' and 'r_size' pair Christian Schoenebeck
2021-12-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] 9p/trans_virtio: resize sg lists to whatever is possible Christian Schoenebeck
2021-12-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] net/9p: add trans_maxsize to struct p9_client Christian Schoenebeck
2021-12-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] 9p/trans_virtio: support larger msize values Christian Schoenebeck
2021-12-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] 9p/trans_virtio: turn amount of sg lists into runtime info Christian Schoenebeck
2021-12-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] 9p: add P9_ERRMAX for 9p2000 and 9p2000.u Christian Schoenebeck
2021-12-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] net/9p: limit 'msize' to KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE for all transports Christian Schoenebeck
2021-12-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] net/9p: add p9_msg_buf_size() Christian Schoenebeck
2021-12-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] 9p/trans_virtio: separate allocation of scatter gather list Christian Schoenebeck
2021-12-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] 9p/trans_virtio: introduce struct virtqueue_sg Christian Schoenebeck
2021-12-30 13:23 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] net/9p: allocate appropriate reduced message buffers Christian Schoenebeck
2022-04-02 14:05 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-04-03 11:29 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-04-03 12:37 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-04-03 14:00 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-01-20 22:43 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] remove msize limit in virtio transport Nikolay Kichukov
2022-01-22 13:34 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-01-24 10:21 ` Nikolay Kichukov [this message]
2022-01-24 11:07 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-01-24 11:57 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-01-24 12:56 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-01-24 13:55 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-01-25 8:45 ` Nikolay Kichukov
2022-05-24 8:10 ` Nikolay Kichukov
2022-05-24 11:29 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-07-07 14:30 ` Christian Schoenebeck
[not found] ` <CAFkjPT=GAoViYd0E7CZQDq3ZjhmYT0DsBytfZXnE10JL0P8O-Q@mail.gmail.com>
2022-07-08 1:15 ` Dominique Martinet
[not found] ` <CAFkjPTngeFh=0mPVW-Yf1Sxkxp_HDNUeANndoYN3-eU9_rGLuQ@mail.gmail.com>
2022-07-08 11:18 ` Christian Schoenebeck
2022-07-08 11:40 ` Dominique Martinet
2022-07-08 13:00 ` Christian Schoenebeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5111aae45d30df13e42073b0af4f16caf9bc79f0.camel@oldum.net \
--to=nikolay@oldum.net \
--cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).