From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephan Gatzka Subject: Re: [net-next (TAKE 2) 0/4] IPv6 over Firewire Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:29:29 +0100 Message-ID: <51177689.4070904@gmail.com> References: <5117620A.4050005@linux-ipv6.org> Reply-To: stephan.gatzka@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, davem@davemloft.net, stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki Return-path: Received: from mail-ea0-f182.google.com ([209.85.215.182]:45145 "EHLO mail-ea0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751826Ab3BJK3d (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Feb 2013 05:29:33 -0500 Received: by mail-ea0-f182.google.com with SMTP id a12so2399051eaa.41 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 02:29:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5117620A.4050005@linux-ipv6.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Yoshifuji! thanks for your submission. The first glance looks good to me but I need to look over your patch set more thoroughly. Were you able to test your changes against different IP over firewire implementations? If not, I will test against the existing Linux implementation, MacOSX and Windows. Regards, Stephan