netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>
To: hannes@stressinduktion.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] ipv6: use newly introduced __ipv6_addr_needs_scope_id and ipv6_iface_scope_id
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:51:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <511AFF9A.8040506@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130213001357.GB1096@order.stressinduktion.org>

On 02/12/2013 07:13 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
>> --- a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
>> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ int inet6_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len)
>>  			struct net_device *dev = NULL;
>>  
>>  			rcu_read_lock();
>> -			if (addr_type & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL) {
>> +			if (__ipv6_addr_needs_scope_id(addr_type)) {
>>  				if (addr_len >= sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6) &&
>>  				    addr->sin6_scope_id) {
>>  					/* Override any existing binding, if another one
> 
> By trying to setup the multicast interface scoped routes by default I
> just found a bug in this patch essentially breaking ipv6 multicast. I
> overlooked that ipv6_addr_type strips off the scopes, thus my check if
> a multicast address needs a scope_id always returns true. I'll check
> if I can convert the ipv6_addr_type calls to __ipv6_addr_type and will
> reroll the patch.  Sorry, my tests were too focused on interface/local
> multicast. :(

I'd always thought of adding helper inlines like these in net/ipv6.h:

static inline bool ipv6_addr_linklocal(const struct in6_addr *a)
{
        return ((a->s6_addr32[0] & htonl(0xFFC00000)) == htonl(0xFE800000));
}

static inline bool ipv6_addr_mc_linklocal(const struct in6_addr *a)
{
        return (((a->s6_addr32[0] & htonl(0xFF000000)) == htonl(0xFF000000)) &&
                ((a->s6_addr32[1] & 0x0F) == IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_LINKLOCAL));
}

Maybe something like that would help here?

When I saw this in patch 3/3 it just seemed like the long way to determine if
the address was a link-local multicast:

	!__ipv6_addr_needs_scope_id(__ipv6_addr_type(&hdr->daddr))

The helper isn't as generic as your patch, but more direct.

-Brian

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-13  2:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-12 22:16 [PATCH net-next 2/3] ipv6: use newly introduced __ipv6_addr_needs_scope_id and ipv6_iface_scope_id Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-02-13  0:13 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-02-13  2:51   ` Brian Haley [this message]
2013-02-13 10:33     ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-02-13 16:47     ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-02-13 17:21       ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-02-14  4:25       ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-02-14 15:25         ` Brian Haley
2013-02-14 18:53           ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-02-14 19:31             ` Brian Haley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=511AFF9A.8040506@hp.com \
    --to=brian.haley@hp.com \
    --cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).