From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kaber@trash.net, ataschner@suse.com
Subject: Re: [MacVLAN] failure to deliver reassembled IPv6 multicast traffic
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:47:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51240118.9050904@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361313484.19353.172.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
On 02/19/2013 02:38 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:22 -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
>> On 02/15/2013 11:35 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 11:27 -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
>>>
>>>> For some reason I was thinking this wasn't fully fixed for IPv4, but
>>>> maybe it is..the bug in our internal tracker only mentions IPv6
>>>> as having issues...
>>>>
>>>> We'll do some testing on IPv4 sometime soon to make sure, and can test
>>>> IPv6 patches as well...
>>>
>>> This worries me a bit, as I wrote this patch because you reported the
>>> issue.
>>
>> We just did some testing on this on the 3.7.6+ kernel. IPv4 multicast to
>> mac-vlans works OK with large packets if there is a single multicast receiver,
>> but does NOT work if there are multiple multicast receivers (ie, several
>> mac-vlans with an mcast receive bound to each mvlan).
>>
>> Our setup also involves routing rules and send-to-self rules,
>> with sender on the same machine, but I'm not sure that matters
>> too much or not.
>
> It might matter, because before commit 6d1ccff627806829c (net: reset mac
> header in dev_start_xmit() ), we were accessing wrong ethernet header in
> macvlan_broadcast() in the send-to-self path
I have that patch in my tree already, so it does not fix the
problem... Also, I mos-spoke slightly...the test was on 3.7.9+
kernel...
Our test setup is not simple, and is driven by a proprietary
user-space application. I can set it up on a system and
give you access if you want (you could investigate the
various routing rules, etc, to see how our config actually
happens).
Or, can help you install our app on your system and configure
it to cause this bug. All these features should run fine on
standard upstream kernels.
There's no sane way for me to reproduce our test setup
with standard tools and mcast traffic generator/receivers,
however...
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-19 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-15 17:00 [MacVLAN] failure to deliver reassembled IPv6 multicast traffic Erik Hugne
2013-02-15 18:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-02-15 19:07 ` Ben Greear
2013-02-15 19:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-02-15 19:27 ` Ben Greear
2013-02-15 19:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-02-16 2:25 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-02-16 2:57 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-02-16 8:48 ` Erik Hugne
2013-02-19 22:22 ` Ben Greear
2013-02-19 22:37 ` Ben Greear
2013-02-19 22:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-02-19 22:47 ` Ben Greear [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51240118.9050904@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ataschner@suse.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=erik.hugne@ericsson.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).