From: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ipv6: Split from and expires field in dst_entry out of union [net-next]
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:31:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <512497EE.8000100@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361343610.19353.177.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
On 2013/02/20 15:00, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 14:33 +0800, Gao feng wrote:
>
>> How can we?
>> one usage of rt6_update_expires and rt6_set_expires
>> is changing rt6->dst.from to rt6->dst.expires, we should release the
>> already holded reference of rt6->dst.from.
>>
>
> Just don't union the two fields, as Neil did.
>
> Setting the dst.expires value should not change dst.from at all.
>
Get it,it looks good to me.we can make sure dst->from doesn't
being operated at same time.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-20 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-18 23:55 [RFC] ipv6: rt6_update_expires() seems racy Eric Dumazet
2013-02-19 20:28 ` [RFC PATCH] ipv6: Split from and expires field in dst_entry out of union [net-next] Neil Horman
2013-02-19 21:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-02-19 21:49 ` Neil Horman
2013-02-19 21:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-02-20 6:33 ` Gao feng
2013-02-20 7:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-02-20 9:31 ` Gao feng [this message]
2013-02-20 10:02 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-02-20 10:17 ` [PATCH] ipv6: fix race condition regarding dst->expires and dst->from YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-02-20 10:25 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-02-20 10:29 ` [PATCH V2] " YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
2013-02-20 16:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-02-20 16:34 ` Neil Horman
2013-02-20 20:12 ` David Miller
2013-02-20 10:55 ` [RFC PATCH] ipv6: Split from and expires field in dst_entry out of union [net-next] David Laight
2013-02-20 12:02 ` Neil Horman
2013-02-20 12:08 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=512497EE.8000100@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jbohac@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).