From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
To: Agalakov Daniil <ade@amicon.ru>
Cc: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <lvc-project@linuxtesting.org>,
Daniil Iskhakov <dish@amicon.ru>, Roman Razov <rrv@amicon.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/3] e1000: fix endianness conversion of uninitialized words
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 16:26:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5128e54e-4164-4cb1-8ae1-e58d6a40c005@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260318120512.687149-3-ade@amicon.ru>
On 3/18/2026 5:05 AM, Agalakov Daniil wrote:
> [Why]
> In e1000_set_eeprom(), the eeprom_buff is allocated to hold a range of
> words. However, only the boundary words (the first and the last) are
> populated from the EEPROM if the write request is not word-aligned.
> The words in the middle of the buffer remain uninitialized because they
> are intended to be completely overwritten by the new data via memcpy().
>
> The previous implementation had a loop that performed le16_to_cpus()
> on the entire buffer. This resulted in endianness conversion being
> performed on uninitialized memory for all interior words.
>
> Fix this by converting the endianness only for the boundary words
> immediately after they are successfully read from the EEPROM.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
While this is definitely better, I'm not sure there's a bug here since
it's being immediately overwritten. Seems like this patch would be
better going to *-next as an improvement.
Thanks,
Tony
> Co-developed-by: Iskhakov Daniil <dish@amicon.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Iskhakov Daniil <dish@amicon.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Agalakov Daniil <ade@amicon.ru>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
> index 4dcbeabb3ad2..c15ad95c63c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
> @@ -499,6 +499,9 @@ static int e1000_set_eeprom(struct net_device *netdev,
> if (ret_val)
> goto out;
>
> + /* Device's eeprom is always little-endian, word addressable */
> + le16_to_cpus(&eeprom_buff[0]);
> +
> ptr++;
> }
> if ((eeprom->offset + eeprom->len) & 1) {
> @@ -509,11 +512,10 @@ static int e1000_set_eeprom(struct net_device *netdev,
> &eeprom_buff[last_word - first_word]);
> if (ret_val)
> goto out;
> - }
>
> - /* Device's eeprom is always little-endian, word addressable */
> - for (i = 0; i < last_word - first_word + 1; i++)
> - le16_to_cpus(&eeprom_buff[i]);
> + /* Device's eeprom is always little-endian, word addressable */
> + le16_to_cpus(&eeprom_buff[last_word - first_word]);
> + }
>
> memcpy(ptr, bytes, eeprom->len);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-24 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-18 12:05 [PATCH net 0/3] e1000/e1000e: fix uninitialized memory access in EEPROM write Agalakov Daniil
2026-03-18 12:05 ` [PATCH net 1/3] e1000: check return value of e1000_read_eeprom Agalakov Daniil
2026-03-18 15:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-03-18 12:05 ` [PATCH net 2/3] e1000: fix endianness conversion of uninitialized words Agalakov Daniil
2026-03-18 15:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-03-24 23:26 ` Tony Nguyen [this message]
2026-03-25 15:19 ` Fedor Pchelkin
2026-03-25 23:01 ` Jacob Keller
2026-03-18 12:05 ` [PATCH net 3/3] e1000e: " Agalakov Daniil
2026-03-18 15:39 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-03-24 23:27 ` Tony Nguyen
2026-03-25 15:02 ` [PATCH net v2] e1000: check return value of e1000_read_eeprom Agalakov Daniil
2026-03-25 15:42 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-03-25 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] e1000/e1000e: limit endianness conversion to boundary words Agalakov Daniil
2026-03-25 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] e1000: " Agalakov Daniil
2026-03-26 7:29 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-03-25 15:16 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] e1000e: " Agalakov Daniil
2026-03-26 7:28 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-03-25 16:00 ` [PATCH net v3] e1000: check return value of e1000_read_eeprom Agalakov Daniil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5128e54e-4164-4cb1-8ae1-e58d6a40c005@intel.com \
--to=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ade@amicon.ru \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dish@amicon.ru \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=rrv@amicon.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox