From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eliezer Tamir Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] net: low latency Ethernet device polling Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:17:17 +0200 Message-ID: <512E5BBD.2040803@linux.intel.com> References: <20130227175549.10611.82188.stgit@gitlad.jf.intel.com> <20130227101354.15636ba5@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephen Hemminger , Eliezer Tamir , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Dave Miller , Jesse Brandeburg , e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Willem de Bruijn , Andi Kleen , HPA , Eliezer Tamir To: Tom Herbert Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 27/02/2013 20:47, Tom Herbert wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Stephen Hemminger > wrote: >> >> Have you looked at netmap? Seems like a cleaner user API for this. >> > That might be a bit orthogonal to this. I believe the intent it to > allow spin polling from socket calls without API change. Exactly. BTW, an interesting alternative to netmap would be to map a VF into userspace. (you would need to pre-allocate DMA memory regions and all of that RDMA-like stuff)