From: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linda Walsh <lkml@tlinx.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: upgrade to 3.8.1 : BUG Scheduling while atomic in bonding driver:
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:50:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <513862DA.20704@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <513854E6.9010709@tlinx.org>
On 03/07/2013 04:50 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
>
> I am *not* seeing the bug in 3.8.2 with the 2nd patch applied (in
> addition to the first)...
So that means bond lock is the reason, nice, but this is really not a
good fix if we just unlock it...
The better way is to move the cycle wait logical out of the
bond_update_speed_duplex() IMO, I think we need the folk who work on
this driver to make the decision ;-)
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
>
> Michael Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> And both bond_enslave() and bond_mii_monitor() are using bond_update_speed_duplex()
>> with preempt disabled.
>>
>> Along with the changes in bond_enslave(), I think you also need this (untested):
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> index 11d01d6..9af143a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>> @@ -2373,7 +2373,9 @@ static void bond_miimon_commit(struct bonding *bond)
>> bond_set_backup_slave(slave);
>> }
>>
>> + read_unlock(&bond->lock);
>> bond_update_speed_duplex(slave);
>> + read_lock(&bond->lock);
>>
>> pr_info("%s: link status definitely up for interface %s, %u Mbps %s duplex.\n",
>> bond->dev->name, slave->dev->name,
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Michael Wang
>>
>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-07 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <513063B4.8070604@tlinx.org>
2013-03-01 16:24 ` upgrade to 3.8.1 : BUG Scheduling while atomic in bonding driver: Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <51317FCF.1070400@tlinx.org>
2013-03-02 5:21 ` Linda Walsh
2013-03-07 5:51 ` Michael Wang
2013-03-07 7:05 ` Linda Walsh
2013-03-07 7:48 ` Michael Wang
2013-03-07 8:04 ` Michael Wang
[not found] ` <513854E6.9010709@tlinx.org>
2013-03-07 9:50 ` Michael Wang [this message]
2013-03-07 14:59 ` Veaceslav Falico
2013-03-07 8:52 Linda Walsh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=513862DA.20704@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@tlinx.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).