* [RFC net-next 01/11] firewire net: No need to reset dev->local_fifo after failure of fw_core_add_address_handler().
@ 2013-03-08 1:42 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki @ 2013-03-08 1:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stefanr, linux1394-devel; +Cc: netdev
fwnet_broadcast_start() try to register address handler at first
if it was not registered yet; dev->local_fifo ==
FWNET_NO_FIFO_ADDR.
Since dev->local_info not changed if fw_core_add_address_hander()
has failed, we do not need to set dev->local_info to
FWNET_NO_FIFO_ADDR.
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
---
drivers/firewire/net.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firewire/net.c b/drivers/firewire/net.c
index 2b27bff..a7a0e82 100644
--- a/drivers/firewire/net.c
+++ b/drivers/firewire/net.c
@@ -1220,8 +1220,8 @@ static int fwnet_broadcast_start(struct fwnet_device *dev)
dev->broadcast_rcv_context = NULL;
failed_context_create:
fw_core_remove_address_handler(&dev->handler);
- failed_initial:
dev->local_fifo = FWNET_NO_FIFO_ADDR;
+ failed_initial:
return retval;
}
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-03-08 1:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-08 1:42 [RFC net-next 01/11] firewire net: No need to reset dev->local_fifo after failure of fw_core_add_address_handler() YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).