From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tim Gardner Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v3] SUNRPC: rpcrdma_register_default_external: Dynamically allocate ib_phys_buf Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 20:53:18 -0600 Message-ID: <513E989E.8060206@canonical.com> References: <4FA345DA4F4AE44899BD2B03EEEC2FA9286BA156@sacexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com> <1363036508-24935-1-git-send-email-tim.gardner@canonical.com> <20130311212535.GG642@fieldses.org> <513E6271.3060107@opengridcomputing.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Trond Myklebust , "David S. Miller" , Tom Tucker , Haggai Eran , Or Gerlitz , Shani Michaeli , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Tom Tucker Return-path: In-Reply-To: <513E6271.3060107@opengridcomputing.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 03/11/2013 05:02 PM, Tom Tucker wrote: > On 3/11/13 4:25 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> Looks good to me; wish we could get it tested.... > > I will test it. Tim could you please send me a final version that you'd > like tested as a single message? > I'm a little confused about what you are asking. I think v3 of the patch is the final version (unless you find bugs with it). > Would someone (like Tim maybe ... hint hint) look at tearing out all > those dead registration strategies? I don't think we need or will ever > use bounce-buffers, memory windows, or mlnx fmr. The only two that are > used and tested are all-phys and FRMR (the default). > Dunno if I'll get time for that. I had a one day window where I could hack out some simple patches. Now I'm back to the usual grindstone. rtg -- Tim Gardner tim.gardner@canonical.com