* rt2x00: Kconfig symbols RALINK_RT288X and RALINK_RT305X @ 2013-03-13 8:59 Paul Bolle 2013-03-13 9:51 ` Jonas Gorski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Paul Bolle @ 2013-03-13 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ivo van Doorn, Gertjan van Wingerde, Helmut Schaa, John W. Linville Cc: linux-wireless, users, netdev, linux-kernel 0) Support for rt2800pci (or "the rt2860/rt3090 chipsets") was added in v2.6.33 (three years ago). References to the related Kconfig symbols RALINK_RT288X and RALINK_RT305X were introduced in that release. So were checks for their macros (CONFIG_RALINK_RT288X and CONFIG_RALINK_RT305X). 1) The Kconfig symbols themselves were never added in mainline. So these references and macros appear to be just markers for dead code in mainline, as that code will not be built. 2) This was previously discussed in https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/14/110 . The patch submitted in that message (which would remove all the dead code at the time) did not get applied. 3) What is the current status of the (out of tree) code that adds RALINK_RT288X and RALINK_RT305X? Paul Bolle ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: rt2x00: Kconfig symbols RALINK_RT288X and RALINK_RT305X 2013-03-13 8:59 rt2x00: Kconfig symbols RALINK_RT288X and RALINK_RT305X Paul Bolle @ 2013-03-13 9:51 ` Jonas Gorski [not found] ` <CAOiHx=n4a26z=PS02E2KjD2Y3Pp0P0x-5Ns6WRc-WScNF=EO_Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Jonas Gorski @ 2013-03-13 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Bolle Cc: Ivo van Doorn, Gertjan van Wingerde, Helmut Schaa, John W. Linville, linux-wireless, users, netdev, linux-kernel, John Crispin On 13 March 2013 09:59, Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> wrote: > 0) Support for rt2800pci (or "the rt2860/rt3090 chipsets") was added in > v2.6.33 (three years ago). References to the related Kconfig symbols > RALINK_RT288X and RALINK_RT305X were introduced in that release. So were > checks for their macros (CONFIG_RALINK_RT288X and CONFIG_RALINK_RT305X). > > 1) The Kconfig symbols themselves were never added in mainline. So these > references and macros appear to be just markers for dead code in > mainline, as that code will not be built. > > 2) This was previously discussed in > https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/14/110 . The patch submitted in that > message (which would remove all the dead code at the time) did not get > applied. > > 3) What is the current status of the (out of tree) code that adds > RALINK_RT288X and RALINK_RT305X? They are now present in 3.9-rc1, see a0b0197c (more specifically 85639910..d3d2b420) :) The actual accepted Kconfig symbol names are different though, so they should be changed in rt2x00 to match them (SOC_RT288X and SOC_RT305X). Jonas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAOiHx=n4a26z=PS02E2KjD2Y3Pp0P0x-5Ns6WRc-WScNF=EO_Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: rt2x00: Kconfig symbols RALINK_RT288X and RALINK_RT305X [not found] ` <CAOiHx=n4a26z=PS02E2KjD2Y3Pp0P0x-5Ns6WRc-WScNF=EO_Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2013-03-13 10:03 ` Paul Bolle 2013-03-13 10:35 ` Jonas Gorski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Paul Bolle @ 2013-03-13 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonas Gorski Cc: Ivo van Doorn, Gertjan van Wingerde, Helmut Schaa, John W. Linville, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, users-poMEt7QlJxcwIE2E9O76wjtx2kNaKg5H, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, John Crispin On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 10:51 +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote: > On 13 March 2013 09:59, Paul Bolle <pebolle-IWqWACnzNjzz+pZb47iToQ@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > 3) What is the current status of the (out of tree) code that adds > > RALINK_RT288X and RALINK_RT305X? > > They are now present in 3.9-rc1, see a0b0197c (more specifically > 85639910..d3d2b420) :) Great. > The actual accepted Kconfig symbol names are different though, so they > should be changed in rt2x00 to match them (SOC_RT288X and SOC_RT305X). Thanks. Note that I could not find an actual Kconfig symbol SOC_RT288X! Anyhow, I guess somebody has the (trivial) patch to convert RALINK_RT...X and CONFIG_RALINK_RT...X to their SOC_* equivalents queued for inclusion in v3.9-rcX. Is that correct? Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: rt2x00: Kconfig symbols RALINK_RT288X and RALINK_RT305X 2013-03-13 10:03 ` Paul Bolle @ 2013-03-13 10:35 ` Jonas Gorski 2013-03-13 11:19 ` John Crispin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Jonas Gorski @ 2013-03-13 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Bolle Cc: Ivo van Doorn, Gertjan van Wingerde, Helmut Schaa, John W. Linville, linux-wireless, users, netdev, linux-kernel, John Crispin On 13 March 2013 11:03, Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl> wrote: > On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 10:51 +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote: >> The actual accepted Kconfig symbol names are different though, so they >> should be changed in rt2x00 to match them (SOC_RT288X and SOC_RT305X). > > Thanks. Note that I could not find an actual Kconfig symbol SOC_RT288X! Ah, yes, the inital submission only included RT305X support, not RT288X (and neither of the newer chips). These will come later. > Anyhow, I guess somebody has the (trivial) patch to convert > RALINK_RT...X and CONFIG_RALINK_RT...X to their SOC_* equivalents queued > for inclusion in v3.9-rcX. Is that correct? Yes, that should be everything. John Crispin, anything missing from that? Jonas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: rt2x00: Kconfig symbols RALINK_RT288X and RALINK_RT305X 2013-03-13 10:35 ` Jonas Gorski @ 2013-03-13 11:19 ` John Crispin 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: John Crispin @ 2013-03-13 11:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonas Gorski Cc: Paul Bolle, Ivo van Doorn, Gertjan van Wingerde, Helmut Schaa, John W. Linville, linux-wireless, users, netdev, linux-kernel On 13/03/13 11:35, Jonas Gorski wrote: > On 13 March 2013 11:03, Paul Bolle<pebolle@tiscali.nl> wrote: >> On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 10:51 +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote: >>> The actual accepted Kconfig symbol names are different though, so they >>> should be changed in rt2x00 to match them (SOC_RT288X and SOC_RT305X). >> Thanks. Note that I could not find an actual Kconfig symbol SOC_RT288X! > Ah, yes, the inital submission only included RT305X support, not > RT288X (and neither of the newer chips). These will come later. > >> Anyhow, I guess somebody has the (trivial) patch to convert >> RALINK_RT...X and CONFIG_RALINK_RT...X to their SOC_* equivalents queued >> for inclusion in v3.9-rcX. Is that correct? > Yes, that should be everything. John Crispin, anything missing from that? > > > Jonas > > Hi, I will look into this later this week. John ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-03-13 11:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-13 8:59 rt2x00: Kconfig symbols RALINK_RT288X and RALINK_RT305X Paul Bolle
2013-03-13 9:51 ` Jonas Gorski
[not found] ` <CAOiHx=n4a26z=PS02E2KjD2Y3Pp0P0x-5Ns6WRc-WScNF=EO_Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-13 10:03 ` Paul Bolle
2013-03-13 10:35 ` Jonas Gorski
2013-03-13 11:19 ` John Crispin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).