From: Thomas Martitz <thomas.martitz@hhi.fraunhofer.de>
To: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"herbert@gondor.apana.org.au" <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: Trying to implement secondary loopback
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:07:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51433934.3080405@hhi.fraunhofer.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5143353C.3050107@hhi.fraunhofer.de>
Am 15.03.2013 15:50, schrieb Thomas Martitz:
> Am 15.03.2013 15:45, schrieb richard -rw- weinberger:
>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Thomas Martitz
>> <thomas.martitz@hhi.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
>>> Am 15.03.2013 15:32, schrieb richard -rw- weinberger:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Thomas Martitz
>>>> <thomas.martitz@hhi.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The real question is, why do you need a second one?
>>>>>> I assume your driver (for the non-existing hardware) is a ethernet
>>>>>> driver,
>>>>>> and now you're looking for a way to test your shiny new ethX device,
>>>>>> correct?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes. But that's only the first step. Once I have the basic ethX device
>>>>> working I want to make sure the PCIe data transfer is working (with
>>>>> good
>>>>> performance), ideally using the very same test application in user
>>>>> space.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And there is the second loopback device is this picture?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Mine is the second one, as I cannot modify "lo". The standard "lo"
>>> interface
>>> is the the first loopback and it seems to be hardcoded to be the only
>>> one.
>>
>> And why can't you implement a regular ethernet driver like everyone
>> else does?
>>
>
>
> That was actually my first attepmt, because I was sure it would work.
> However when I tried that I had trouble to get transfers on localhost
> routed to my code. I did "ifconfig lo down" but then it didn't transfer
> at all. I will retry.
>
Same result. I assumed the kernel treats lo in a special way for
localhost-connections and that it would be impossible to achieve the
same with a custom interface.
I did the following:
ifconfig lo down
insmod ./mykmod.ko
ifconfig eth2 up
ifconfig eth2 127.0.0.1
At this point ifconfig prints the same information for eth2 that it had
printed for lo before (except for the LOOPBACK flag, but I can enable
that one as well by adding IFF_LOOPBACK to the interface flags in the
module). Yet my test application only works with lo, not eth2.
Best regards.
-----
visit us at
OFC 2013 / March 19-21 / Anaheim Convention Center, CA, USA / booth 11807
NABSHOW 2013 / April 8-11 / Las Vegas Convention Center, Nevada, USA / booth C7843
www.hhi.fraunhofer.de/events
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-15 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-12 12:05 Trying to implement secondary loopback Thomas Martitz
2013-03-13 11:13 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2013-03-13 20:38 ` Martitz, Thomas
2013-03-13 20:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-03-13 21:07 ` AW: " Martitz, Thomas
2013-03-13 21:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-03-13 22:01 ` AW: " Martitz, Thomas
2013-03-15 7:30 ` Thomas Martitz
2013-03-15 8:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-03-15 13:49 ` Thomas Martitz
2013-03-15 13:56 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2013-03-15 14:08 ` Thomas Martitz
2013-03-15 14:16 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2013-03-15 14:20 ` Thomas Martitz
2013-03-15 14:32 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2013-03-15 14:35 ` Thomas Martitz
2013-03-15 14:45 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2013-03-15 14:50 ` Thomas Martitz
2013-03-15 15:07 ` Thomas Martitz [this message]
2013-03-15 15:15 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-03-15 15:37 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2013-03-15 19:48 ` Martitz, Thomas
2013-03-18 9:33 ` Thomas Martitz
2013-03-15 18:36 ` Ben Hutchings
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-11 9:49 Thomas Martitz
2013-03-11 9:25 Thomas Martitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51433934.3080405@hhi.fraunhofer.de \
--to=thomas.martitz@hhi.fraunhofer.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).