From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
To: Johannes Nixdorf <jnixdorf-oss@avm.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Cc: bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/6] net: bridge: Track and limit dynamically learned FDB entries
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 13:49:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5146e687-f5b8-86b2-e4e3-29871fe4fa5c@blackwall.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230919-fdb_limit-v4-3-39f0293807b8@avm.de>
On 9/19/23 11:12, Johannes Nixdorf wrote:
> A malicious actor behind one bridge port may spam the kernel with packets
> with a random source MAC address, each of which will create an FDB entry,
> each of which is a dynamic allocation in the kernel.
>
> There are roughly 2^48 different MAC addresses, further limited by the
> rhashtable they are stored in to 2^31. Each entry is of the type struct
> net_bridge_fdb_entry, which is currently 128 bytes big. This means the
> maximum amount of memory allocated for FDB entries is 2^31 * 128B =
> 256GiB, which is too much for most computers.
>
> Mitigate this by maintaining a per bridge count of those automatically
> generated entries in fdb_n_learned, and a limit in fdb_max_learned. If
> the limit is hit new entries are not learned anymore.
>
> For backwards compatibility the default setting of 0 disables the limit.
>
> User-added entries by netlink or from bridge or bridge port addresses
> are never blocked and do not count towards that limit.
>
> Introduce a new fdb entry flag BR_FDB_DYNAMIC_LEARNED to keep track of
> whether an FDB entry is included in the count. The flag is enabled for
> dynamically learned entries, and disabled for all other entries. This
> should be equivalent to BR_FDB_ADDED_BY_USER and BR_FDB_LOCAL being unset,
> but contrary to the two flags it can be toggled atomically.
>
> Atomicity is required here, as there are multiple callers that modify the
> flags, but are not under a common lock (br_fdb_update is the exception
> for br->hash_lock, br_fdb_external_learn_add for RTNL).
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Nixdorf <jnixdorf-oss@avm.de>
> ---
> net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> net/bridge/br_private.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
I think this is a good counting start. :) It'd be nice to get
more eyes on this one.
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-20 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-19 8:12 [PATCH net-next v4 0/6] bridge: Add a limit on learned FDB entries Johannes Nixdorf
2023-09-19 8:12 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/6] net: bridge: Set BR_FDB_ADDED_BY_USER early in fdb_add_entry Johannes Nixdorf
2023-09-20 10:44 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-09-21 12:13 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-09-19 8:12 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/6] net: bridge: Set strict_start_type for br_policy Johannes Nixdorf
2023-09-20 10:46 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-09-21 7:23 ` Johannes Nixdorf
2023-09-21 10:14 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-09-22 12:18 ` Johannes Nixdorf
2023-09-19 8:12 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/6] net: bridge: Track and limit dynamically learned FDB entries Johannes Nixdorf
2023-09-20 10:49 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov [this message]
2023-09-26 11:22 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-09-19 8:12 ` [PATCH net-next v4 4/6] net: bridge: Add netlink knobs for number / max " Johannes Nixdorf
2023-09-20 10:50 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-09-21 7:29 ` Johannes Nixdorf
2023-09-21 12:41 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-09-21 12:51 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-09-19 8:12 ` [PATCH net-next v4 5/6] net: bridge: Add a configurable default FDB learning limit Johannes Nixdorf
2023-09-20 11:00 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-09-21 8:06 ` Johannes Nixdorf
2023-09-21 10:19 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-09-26 11:42 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-09-19 8:12 ` [PATCH net-next v4 6/6] selftests: forwarding: bridge_fdb_learning_limit: Add a new selftest Johannes Nixdorf
2023-09-20 11:01 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5146e687-f5b8-86b2-e4e3-29871fe4fa5c@blackwall.org \
--to=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=jnixdorf-oss@avm.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rempel-privat.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).