From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: eparis@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, rgb@redhat.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-audit@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] audit: Simplify by assuming the callers socket buffer is large enough
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:27:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5147229.ivUnbSCGlH@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140307.194801.1893514114998807038.davem@davemloft.net>
On Friday, March 07, 2014 07:48:01 PM David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 17:52:02 -0500
>
> > Audit is non-tolerant to failure and loss.
>
> Netlink is not a loss-less transport.
Perhaps. But in all our testing over the years its been very good.
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-08 3:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <8738j3vzry.fsf@xmission.com>
[not found] ` <20140301011142.GK16640@madcap2.tricolour.ca>
[not found] ` <87fvn2r0yb.fsf@xmission.com>
[not found] ` <874n3ir0uw.fsf_-_@xmission.com>
2014-03-01 4:50 ` [RFC][PATCH] audit: Simplify by assuming the callers socket buffer is large enough Eric W. Biederman
2014-03-04 21:30 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-04 21:51 ` David Miller
2014-03-04 22:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-03-04 22:50 ` Andrew Morton
2014-03-10 3:06 ` [GIT PULL] namespaces fixes for 3.14-rcX Eric W. Biederman
2014-03-10 13:59 ` Eric Paris
2014-03-10 19:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-03-16 18:36 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-03-05 0:21 ` [RFC][PATCH] audit: Simplify by assuming the callers socket buffer is large enough David Miller
2014-03-05 16:59 ` Steve Grubb
2014-03-05 18:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-03-07 22:52 ` Eric Paris
2014-03-08 0:48 ` David Miller
2014-03-08 3:27 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2014-03-08 6:34 ` David Miller
2014-03-08 3:56 ` Eric Paris
2014-03-10 19:30 ` David Miller
2014-03-10 21:57 ` Eric Paris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5147229.ivUnbSCGlH@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).