From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mst@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net_sched: don't do precise pkt_len computation for untrusted packets
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:19:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <514954F0.2040604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363697906.21184.53.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
On 03/19/2013 08:58 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 05:10 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 17:25 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>>> I believe before doing header check for untrusted packets, the only
>>> thing we can trust is skb->len and that's we've used before
>>> 1def9238d4aa2. But after that, we're trying to use unchecked or
>>> meaningless value (e.g gso_segs were reset to zero in
>>> tun/macvtap/packet), and guest then can utilize this to result a very
>>> huge (-1U) pkt_len by filling evil value in the header. Can all kinds of
>>> packet scheduler survive this kinds of possible DOS?
>> I would use the flow dissector to fix the transport header from all
>> DODGY providers.
>>
>> Daniel Borkmann is working on a patch serie adding nhoff into flow_keys,
>> and adding __skb_get_poff(const struct sk_buff *skb), for a BPF
>> extension we talked about in Copenhagen / Netfilter Workshop.
>>
>> You could then set the transport header offset to the right value.
>>
>> (and drop evil packets before they go further in the stack)
>>
>> if (gso_packet(skb)) {
>> u32 poff = __skb_get_poff(skb);
>>
>> if (!poff) {
>> drop_evil_packet(skb);
>> } else {
>> skb_set_transport_header(skb, poff);
>> ...
>> }
>> }
>
> Oh well, no need to use __skb_get_poff() but plain skb_flow_dissect()
> (once patched to include thoff in struct flow_keys)
>
> struct flow_keys keys;
>
> if (!skb_flow_dissect(skb, &keys))
> goto drop;
>
> if ((gso_type & (SKB_GSO_TCPV4|SKB_GSO_TCPV6)) &&
> keys.ip_proto != IP_PROTO_TCP)
> goto drop;
>
> skb_set_transport_header(skb, keys.thoff);
I was consider a just skb_reset_transport_header() here. Consider the
transport header maybe checked and reset during header check for packets
of gso or partial checksum. And bypass precise pkt len computation.
Some problems with skb_flow_dissect():
- it can only recognizes a subset of all ethernet protocols. The may
blocks guest who may want to use other protocol such as IPX.
- almost no check in the validity of the L4 protocol header which may be
used by qdisc_pkt_len_init(), which may still give a chance to evil
guest to use
- gso_segs were untouched (still zero)
Another method is doing header check here which needs more work.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-20 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-15 7:41 [PATCH net-next 1/2] net_sched: don't do precise pkt_len computation for untrusted packets Jason Wang
2013-03-15 7:41 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: reset transport header if it was not set before transmission Jason Wang
2013-03-16 2:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-17 16:13 ` David Miller
2013-03-19 9:26 ` Jason Wang
2013-03-19 12:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-19 12:58 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-03-19 12:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-19 13:52 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-03-17 16:10 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net_sched: don't do precise pkt_len computation for untrusted packets David Miller
2013-03-19 9:25 ` Jason Wang
2013-03-19 12:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-19 12:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-20 6:19 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2013-03-20 13:46 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=514954F0.2040604@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).