From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: fix psock_fanout selftest hash collision
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 07:31:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <514AA946.6020603@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+FuTScnkvSZ1U=vmELNEpS4hU62iMV7B2ZDHT8KGAwxCxA-Ng@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/21/2013 01:07 AM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:59 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>> From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:33:44 -0400 (EDT)
>>
>>> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 02:42:44 -0400
>>>
>>>> Fix flaky results with PACKET_FANOUT_HASH depending on whether the
>>>> two flows hash into the same packet socket or not.
>>>>
>>>> Also adds tests for PACKET_FANOUT_LB and PACKET_FANOUT_CPU and
>>>> replaces the counting method with a packet ring.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks. I'll retest on my sparc64 box later today.
>>
>> Unfortunately, it's still broken there:
>
> This looks like a new problem. Now the counters all stay zero.
>
> I am looking into it. I have not been able to reproduce this on my
> x86_64 so far, so just brought a sparc32 up in qemu. Had less luck
> with sparc64, but impressive that it works at all. Come to think of
> it, is this a 64-bit kernel with 32-bit userland? Perhaps that
> affects packet ring memory layout.
That can affect the ring buffer in case of TPACKET_V1, which is default
if not specified otherwise. See Documentation/networking/packet_mmap.txt +514
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-21 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-19 20:18 [PATCH net-next v3] packet: packet fanout rollover during socket overload Willem de Bruijn
2013-03-19 20:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-19 21:16 ` David Miller
2013-03-19 21:34 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-03-20 6:37 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-03-20 6:42 ` [PATCH net-next] net: fix psock_fanout selftest hash collision Willem de Bruijn
2013-03-20 16:33 ` David Miller
2013-03-20 17:59 ` David Miller
2013-03-21 0:07 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-03-21 1:16 ` David Miller
2013-03-21 6:31 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2013-03-21 17:27 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-03-21 17:46 ` David Miller
2013-03-21 17:47 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-03-21 18:00 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-03-21 17:49 ` David Miller
2013-03-21 17:56 ` David Miller
2013-03-21 18:01 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-03-21 18:10 ` [PATCH net-next] net: fix psock_fanout on sparc64 Willem de Bruijn
2013-03-21 18:31 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=514AA946.6020603@redhat.com \
--to=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).