netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: reduce net_rx_action() latency to 2 HZ
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:25:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <514B429C.5070605@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363879647.4431.8.camel@edumazet-glaptop>

On 13-03-21 11:27 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-03-21 at 11:03 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>> [CC'ing stable & Willy - for the older releases not fed by
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/davem/stable/ ]
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazt@google.com>
>>>
>>> We should use time_after_eq() to get maximum latency of two ticks,
>>> instead of three.
>>>
>>> Bug added in commit 24f8b2385 (net: increase receive packet quantum)
>>
>> I'm not sure what applications would notice the extra tick, but 24f8b takes
>> us back to 2.6.29.  It cherry picks cleanly onto 2.6.34, so it probably also
>> does the same for Willy's 2.6.32 longterm too.
>>
>> Commit is now mainline d114a3338747255518 - v3.9-rc3~36^2~34.
> 
> BQL (Bytes Queue Limit) relies on TX completion being run often, and
> Qdisc being serviced often as well. If net_rx_action() hogs the cpu,
> net_tx_action() is delayed and NIC can stall.
> 
> I wrote this patch because I was investigating a regression when a
> Google application began using BQL enabled kernels.
> 
> About the latency in itself, following commit is way more interesting.
> 
> commit c10d73671ad30f5 (softirq: reduce latencies)
> 
> As without it, I could trigger more than 50ms latencies for the poor
> user thread interrupted by softirq processing.

That is also reasonably portable back to 2.6.34.  And it is more
interesting too -- it will be interesting in a preempt_rt context
too, once RT moves ahead off the current 3.6 baseline, which still
has the old count-limit of 10 vs the new 2ms time limit.

RT (3.4 and 3.6 based) currently has this patch from Steven:
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/paulg/3.6-rt-patches.git/tree/net-tx-action-avoid-livelock-on-rt.patch

Anyway, thanks for the heads up on this commit.
Paul.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-21 17:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-05 17:15 [PATCH] net: reduce net_rx_action() latency to 2 HZ Eric Dumazet
2013-03-21 15:03 ` Paul Gortmaker
2013-03-21 15:27   ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-21 17:25     ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2013-03-21 17:43       ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-21 18:45         ` Steven Rostedt
2013-03-24  1:02       ` Willy Tarreau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=514B429C.5070605@windriver.com \
    --to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).