From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Jones Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] tcp: add a global sysctl to control TCP delayed ack Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:39:31 -0700 Message-ID: <5162F2C3.10107@hp.com> References: <1365070560-11544-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <20130407.170958.338519719729552895.davem@davemloft.net> <1365385541.31063.0.camel@cr0> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, shemminger@vyatta.com, tgraf@suug.ch, David.Laight@ACULAB.COM To: Cong Wang Return-path: Received: from g5t0009.atlanta.hp.com ([15.192.0.46]:14261 "EHLO g5t0009.atlanta.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934393Ab3DHQjf (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Apr 2013 12:39:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1365385541.31063.0.camel@cr0> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/07/2013 06:45 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 17:09 -0400, David Miller wrote: >> >> I'm not applying a patch that adds a global parameter for >> an attribute which has per-path scope. > > Ok, I will make it per-route. Is setting a per-route attribute to cover the backside of an application for which source code is not available in this day and age really all that much easier than hitting that application with an LD_PRELOAD library to make the desired setsockopt() call? rick jones having flashbacks to similar conversations in other contexts in the 1990s...