From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 4/5] netback: set transport header before passing it to kernel
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:37:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51665A0E.7080607@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365600803.27868.60.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
On 04/10/2013 09:33 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 06:19 +0000, Jason Wang wrote:
>> Currently, for the packets receives from netback, before doing header check,
>> kernel just reset the transport header in netif_receive_skb() which pretends non
>> l4 header. This is suboptimal for precise packet length estimation (introduced
>> in 1def9238: net_sched: more precise pkt_len computation) which needs correct l4
>> header for gso packets.
>>
>> The patch just reuse the header probed by netback for partial checksum packets
>> and tries to use skb_flow_dissect() for other cases, if both fail, just pretend
>> no l4 header.
>>
>> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> index aa28550..fc8faa7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>> #include <linux/udp.h>
>>
>> #include <net/tcp.h>
>> +#include <net/flow_keys.h>
>>
>> #include <xen/xen.h>
>> #include <xen/events.h>
>> @@ -1184,6 +1185,7 @@ static int checksum_setup(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> if (th >= skb_tail_pointer(skb))
>> goto out;
>>
>> + skb_set_transport_header(skb, 4 * iph->ihl);
>> skb->csum_start = th - skb->head;
> Should the use of th here (and perhaps above) be replaced with
> skb_transport_header() too?
Yes, and furthermore looks like we can use skb_partial_csum_set() here,
will send a patch.
Thanks
>> switch (iph->protocol) {
>> case IPPROTO_TCP:
>> @@ -1495,6 +1497,7 @@ static void xen_netbk_tx_submit(struct xen_netbk *netbk)
>>
>> skb->dev = vif->dev;
>> skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, skb->dev);
>> + skb_reset_network_header(skb);
>>
>> if (checksum_setup(vif, skb)) {
>> netdev_dbg(vif->dev,
>> @@ -1503,6 +1506,15 @@ static void xen_netbk_tx_submit(struct xen_netbk *netbk)
>> continue;
>> }
>>
>> + if (!skb_transport_header_was_set(skb)) {
>> + struct flow_keys keys;
>> +
>> + if (skb_flow_dissect(skb, &keys))
>> + skb_set_transport_header(skb, keys.thoff);
>> + else
>> + skb_reset_transport_header(skb);
>> + }
>> +
>> vif->dev->stats.rx_bytes += skb->len;
>> vif->dev->stats.rx_packets++;
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-11 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-26 6:19 [net-next 0/5] set transport header for untrusted packets Jason Wang
2013-03-26 6:19 ` [net-next 1/5] macvtap: set transport header before passing skb to lower device Jason Wang
2013-03-26 15:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-27 3:12 ` Jason Wang
2013-03-26 6:19 ` [net-next 2/5] tuntap: set transport header before passing it to kernel Jason Wang
2013-03-26 15:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-26 6:19 ` [net-next 3/5] packet: set transport header before doing xmit Jason Wang
2013-03-26 6:19 ` [net-next 4/5] netback: set transport header before passing it to kernel Jason Wang
2013-04-10 13:33 ` Ian Campbell
2013-04-11 6:37 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2013-03-26 6:19 ` [net-next 5/5] net_sched: better precise estimation on packet length for untrusted packets Jason Wang
2013-03-26 16:45 ` [net-next 0/5] set transport header " David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51665A0E.7080607@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).