netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 4/5] netback: set transport header before passing it to kernel
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:37:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51665A0E.7080607@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365600803.27868.60.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>

On 04/10/2013 09:33 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 06:19 +0000, Jason Wang wrote:
>> Currently, for the packets receives from netback, before doing header check,
>> kernel just reset the transport header in netif_receive_skb() which pretends non
>> l4 header. This is suboptimal for precise packet length estimation (introduced
>> in 1def9238: net_sched: more precise pkt_len computation) which needs correct l4
>> header for gso packets.
>>
>> The patch just reuse the header probed by netback for partial checksum packets
>> and tries to use skb_flow_dissect() for other cases, if both fail, just pretend
>> no l4 header.
>>
>> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c |   12 ++++++++++++
>>  1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> index aa28550..fc8faa7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/udp.h>
>>  
>>  #include <net/tcp.h>
>> +#include <net/flow_keys.h>
>>  
>>  #include <xen/xen.h>
>>  #include <xen/events.h>
>> @@ -1184,6 +1185,7 @@ static int checksum_setup(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>  	if (th >= skb_tail_pointer(skb))
>>  		goto out;
>>  
>> +	skb_set_transport_header(skb, 4 * iph->ihl);
>>  	skb->csum_start = th - skb->head;
> Should the use of th here (and perhaps above) be replaced with
> skb_transport_header() too?

Yes, and furthermore looks like we can use skb_partial_csum_set() here,
will send a patch.

Thanks
>>  	switch (iph->protocol) {
>>  	case IPPROTO_TCP:
>> @@ -1495,6 +1497,7 @@ static void xen_netbk_tx_submit(struct xen_netbk *netbk)
>>  
>>  		skb->dev      = vif->dev;
>>  		skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, skb->dev);
>> +		skb_reset_network_header(skb);
>>  
>>  		if (checksum_setup(vif, skb)) {
>>  			netdev_dbg(vif->dev,
>> @@ -1503,6 +1506,15 @@ static void xen_netbk_tx_submit(struct xen_netbk *netbk)
>>  			continue;
>>  		}
>>  
>> +		if (!skb_transport_header_was_set(skb)) {
>> +			struct flow_keys keys;
>> +
>> +			if (skb_flow_dissect(skb, &keys))
>> +				skb_set_transport_header(skb, keys.thoff);
>> +			else
>> +				skb_reset_transport_header(skb);
>> +		}
>> +
>>  		vif->dev->stats.rx_bytes += skb->len;
>>  		vif->dev->stats.rx_packets++;
>>  
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-11  6:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-26  6:19 [net-next 0/5] set transport header for untrusted packets Jason Wang
2013-03-26  6:19 ` [net-next 1/5] macvtap: set transport header before passing skb to lower device Jason Wang
2013-03-26 15:06   ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-27  3:12     ` Jason Wang
2013-03-26  6:19 ` [net-next 2/5] tuntap: set transport header before passing it to kernel Jason Wang
2013-03-26 15:07   ` Eric Dumazet
2013-03-26  6:19 ` [net-next 3/5] packet: set transport header before doing xmit Jason Wang
2013-03-26  6:19 ` [net-next 4/5] netback: set transport header before passing it to kernel Jason Wang
2013-04-10 13:33   ` Ian Campbell
2013-04-11  6:37     ` Jason Wang [this message]
2013-03-26  6:19 ` [net-next 5/5] net_sched: better precise estimation on packet length for untrusted packets Jason Wang
2013-03-26 16:45 ` [net-next 0/5] set transport header " David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51665A0E.7080607@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).