From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] xen-netback: switch to use skb_partial_csum_set()
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:58:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51666D28.7090500@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365666364.27868.114.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
On 04/11/2013 03:46 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-11 at 07:35 +0100, Jason Wang wrote:
>> Switch to use skb_partial_csum_set() to simplify the codes.
> This is incremental on top of your previous patch, right?
It's an independent patch, since the previous patch has been applied.
>> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> Note:
>> - Compile test only.
>> ---
>> drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
>> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> index 83905a9..70631f0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
>> @@ -1156,7 +1156,6 @@ static int netbk_set_skb_gso(struct xenvif *vif,
>> static int checksum_setup(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> {
>> struct iphdr *iph;
>> - unsigned char *th;
>> int err = -EPROTO;
>> int recalculate_partial_csum = 0;
>>
>> @@ -1180,28 +1179,26 @@ static int checksum_setup(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> goto out;
>>
>> iph = (void *)skb->data;
>> - th = skb->data + 4 * iph->ihl;
>> - if (th >= skb_tail_pointer(skb))
>> - goto out;
>> -
>> - skb_set_transport_header(skb, 4 * iph->ihl);
> Is removing this line really correct?
After commit e5d5deca (net: core: let skb_partial_csum_set() set
transport header), this work was done by skb_partial_csum_set().
>
>> - skb->csum_start = th - skb->head;
>> switch (iph->protocol) {
>> case IPPROTO_TCP:
>> - skb->csum_offset = offsetof(struct tcphdr, check);
>> + if (!skb_partial_csum_set(skb, 4 * iph->ihl,
>> + offsetof(struct tcphdr, check)))
>> + goto out;
>>
>> if (recalculate_partial_csum) {
>> - struct tcphdr *tcph = (struct tcphdr *)th;
>> + struct tcphdr *tcph = tcp_hdr(skb);
>> tcph->check = ~csum_tcpudp_magic(iph->saddr, iph->daddr,
>> skb->len - iph->ihl*4,
>> IPPROTO_TCP, 0);
>> }
>> break;
>> case IPPROTO_UDP:
>> - skb->csum_offset = offsetof(struct udphdr, check);
>> + if (!skb_partial_csum_set(skb, 4 * iph->ihl,
>> + offsetof(struct udphdr, check)))
>> + goto out;
>>
>> if (recalculate_partial_csum) {
>> - struct udphdr *udph = (struct udphdr *)th;
>> + struct udphdr *udph = udp_hdr(skb);
>> udph->check = ~csum_tcpudp_magic(iph->saddr, iph->daddr,
>> skb->len - iph->ihl*4,
>> IPPROTO_UDP, 0);
>> @@ -1215,9 +1212,6 @@ static int checksum_setup(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - if ((th + skb->csum_offset + 2) > skb_tail_pointer(skb))
>> - goto out;
>> -
>> err = 0;
>>
>> out:
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-11 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-11 6:35 [net-next PATCH] xen-netback: switch to use skb_partial_csum_set() Jason Wang
2013-04-11 7:46 ` Ian Campbell
2013-04-11 7:58 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2013-04-11 8:03 ` Ian Campbell
2013-04-12 18:59 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51666D28.7090500@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).