From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/9] net: sctp: sctp_outq: consolidate chars into bitfield
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:44:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <516EC34B.1040503@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <516E6ABD.2040904@redhat.com>
On 04/17/2013 05:26 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 04/17/2013 10:43 AM, David Laight wrote:
>>> __u32 outstanding_bytes;
>>>
>>> - /* Are we doing fast-rtx on this queue */
>>> - char fast_rtx;
>>> -
>>> - /* Corked? */
>>> - char cork;
>>> -
>>> - /* Is this structure empty? */
>>> - char empty;
>>> + __u8 fast_rtx:1, /* Are we doing fast-rtx on this queue */
>>> + cork:1, /* Corked? */
>>> + empty:1; /* Is this structure empty? */
>>> };
>>
>> Use of bitfields just makes the code slower.
>> The only real excuse for using them is to reduce the size
>> of a structure that is allocated a lot.
>
> sctp_outq is _embedded_ into an sctp_association structure, which
> has [size: 2280, cachelines: 36, members: 76]! A next step would be
> to try to reorder its elements carefully and see if we can reduce
> the size by filling some holes.
I remember attempting this undertaking that led me down the rabbit hole
so fast that my head started to spin. It is a badly needed project, but
be prepared to spend a lot of time on it.
Not sure if the space saving is worth the bad code generated for
bit-fields, especially considering that empty and cork are used on
almost every packet.
-vlad
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-17 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-16 21:07 [PATCH net-next 0/9] Minor SCTP cleanups all over the place Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-16 21:07 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] net: sctp: sctp_ssnmap: remove 'malloced' element from struct Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-17 12:45 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-17 12:52 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-17 17:17 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-17 19:18 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-16 21:07 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] net: sctp: sctp_inq: remove dead code Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-17 12:47 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-16 21:07 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] net: sctp: sctp_outq: remove 'malloced' from its struct Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-17 12:57 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-16 21:07 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] net: sctp: sctp_outq: consolidate chars into bitfield Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-17 8:43 ` David Laight
2013-04-17 9:26 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-17 15:27 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-17 15:35 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-04-17 15:40 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-17 15:38 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-17 15:44 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2013-04-17 15:31 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-16 21:07 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] net: sctp: outqueue: simplify sctp_outq_uncork function Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-17 15:32 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-16 21:07 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] net: sctp: sctp_transport: remove unused variable Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-17 15:34 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-16 21:07 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] net: sctp: sctp_bind_addr: remove dead code Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-17 15:35 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-16 21:07 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] net: sctp: sctp_ulpq: remove 'malloced' struct member Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-17 15:46 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-16 21:07 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] net: sctp: sctp_ulpq: do not use char as a " Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-17 15:36 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-04-17 15:41 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-17 15:45 ` Neil Horman
2013-04-17 16:28 ` David Laight
2013-04-17 18:13 ` [PATCH net-next 0/9] Minor SCTP cleanups all over the place David Miller
2013-04-17 18:55 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=516EC34B.1040503@gmail.com \
--to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).