netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] net/cpsw: don't continue if we miss to allocate rx skbs
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:09:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <516FE26C.5040601@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <516FDDEE.6030906@ti.com>

On 04/18/2013 01:50 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote:

>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> index e2ba702..3b22a36 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> @@ -912,14 +912,16 @@ static int cpsw_ndo_open(struct net_device *ndev)
>>               struct sk_buff *skb;
>>                 ret = -ENOMEM;
>> -            skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(priv->ndev,
>> -                            priv->rx_packet_max);
>> +            skb = __netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(priv->ndev,
>> +                    priv->rx_packet_max, GFP_KERNEL);
>>               if (!skb)
>> -                break;
>> +                goto err_cleanup;
>>               ret = cpdma_chan_submit(priv->rxch, skb, skb->data,
>>                       skb_tailroom(skb), 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>> -            if (WARN_ON(ret < 0))
>> -                break;
>> +            if (ret < 0) {
>> +                kfree_skb(skb);
>> +                goto err_cleanup;
> Why you need to close the device even you have some skb allocated and
> submitted successfully. Can allow the device to continue with lower
> performance

Because this should not happen. If you run out-of-memory because an
application is going crazy than you won't have much anyway. If you
configured too much skbs then this should be fixed as well.

>> +            }
>>           }
>>           /* continue even if we didn't manage to submit all
>>            * receive descs
>> @@ -944,6 +946,10 @@ static int cpsw_ndo_open(struct net_device *ndev)
>>       if (priv->data.dual_emac)
>>           priv->slaves[priv->emac_port].open_stat = true;
>>       return 0;
>> +
>> +err_cleanup:
>> +    cpdma_ctlr_stop(priv->dma);
>> +    return ret;
>>   }
> only cpdma is halted and allocated skb are released, need to have other
> calls like pm_runtime_put_sync, close host and slave ports

Okay, will fix.

> 
> Regards
> Mugunthan V N


Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-18 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-17 21:52 my small cpsw queue Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] net/davinci_cpdma: don't check for jiffies with interrupts Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:49   ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] net/cpsw: don't continue if we miss to allocate rx skbs Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:50   ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-18 12:09     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2013-04-19 10:40       ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22  8:05         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 3/5] net/cpsw: don't rely on netif_running() to check which device is active Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:50   ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-18 12:10     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-19 10:35       ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22  8:30         ` [PATCH 3/5 v2] net/cpsw: don't rely only " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-22  9:14           ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22  9:30             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-22  9:40               ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22  9:49                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-22 10:12                   ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22 10:19                     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-22 19:21           ` David Miller
2013-04-19 13:10   ` [PATCH 3/5] net/cpsw: don't rely " Sergei Shtylyov
2013-04-22  8:33     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 4/5] net/davinci_cpdma: remove unused argument in cpdma_chan_submit() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:51   ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 5/5] net/cpsw: redo rx skb allocation in rx path Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:50   ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-18 12:13     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-19 10:28       ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-18 14:59     ` Eric Dumazet
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-04-23 17:31 cpsw queue, v2 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-23 17:31 ` [PATCH 2/5] net/cpsw: don't continue if we miss to allocate rx skbs Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-23 17:41   ` Mugunthan V N

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=516FE26C.5040601@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=mugunthanvnm@ti.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).