From: Paul Chavent <Paul.Chavent@onera.fr>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] packet: tx timestamping on tpacket ring
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 10:19:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5174F29C.2030806@onera.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+FuTSc9ikN6gOsnKjM4Gv-2M+W-_jwijW4Wy=_RLLuRxoJw9A@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/21/2013 06:42 PM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Tx has the advantage that time sources can be chosen
> per socket independent of all other sockets
Sorry if my question is trivial.
I understand that when we require rx timestamping, we need to ask to the
device to timestamp all incoming packets since we don't know the path of
the packet in advance.
For tx timestamping, you seems to say that the request to timestamp the
packet is contained in the skbuff and is done on a per packet basis ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-22 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-12 15:29 [RFC] net : add tx timestamp to packet mmap Paul Chavent
2012-12-12 19:23 ` David Miller
2012-12-13 7:13 ` Paul Chavent
2012-12-13 13:29 ` Richard Cochran
2012-12-13 16:13 ` Paul Chavent
2012-12-13 18:17 ` Richard Cochran
2012-12-14 7:57 ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-09 10:42 ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-09 13:15 ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-13 18:33 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-13 18:56 ` [PATCH] net-packet: tx timestamping on tpacket ring Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-13 22:18 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-13 22:47 ` David Miller
2013-04-14 0:04 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14 0:16 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14 0:49 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14 5:16 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-14 0:00 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14 10:52 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-14 13:07 ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-15 7:37 ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-15 16:56 ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-15 16:59 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-17 10:22 ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-19 21:51 ` [PATCH net-next v2] packet: " Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-20 12:33 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-21 2:30 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-21 10:10 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-21 16:42 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-21 18:14 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-22 8:19 ` Paul Chavent [this message]
2013-04-22 10:25 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-22 14:23 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-20 16:43 ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-21 2:34 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-15 15:41 ` [PATCH] net-packet: " Paul Chavent
2013-04-15 9:45 ` David Laight
2013-04-15 17:08 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-15 17:31 ` David Miller
2013-04-15 7:31 ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-15 16:37 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5174F29C.2030806@onera.fr \
--to=paul.chavent@onera.fr \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).