From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: Paul Chavent <Paul.Chavent@onera.fr>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] packet: tx timestamping on tpacket ring
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:25:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51751018.2010305@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5174F29C.2030806@onera.fr>
On 04/22/2013 10:19 AM, Paul Chavent wrote:
> On 04/21/2013 06:42 PM, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>> Tx has the advantage that time sources can be chosen
>> per socket independent of all other sockets
>
> Sorry if my question is trivial.
> I understand that when we require rx timestamping, we need to ask to the device to timestamp all incoming packets since we don't know the path of the packet in advance.
> For tx timestamping, you seems to say that the request to timestamp the packet is contained in the skbuff and is done on a per packet basis ?
It's all in: Documentation/networking/timestamping.txt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-22 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-12 15:29 [RFC] net : add tx timestamp to packet mmap Paul Chavent
2012-12-12 19:23 ` David Miller
2012-12-13 7:13 ` Paul Chavent
2012-12-13 13:29 ` Richard Cochran
2012-12-13 16:13 ` Paul Chavent
2012-12-13 18:17 ` Richard Cochran
2012-12-14 7:57 ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-09 10:42 ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-09 13:15 ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-13 18:33 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-13 18:56 ` [PATCH] net-packet: tx timestamping on tpacket ring Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-13 22:18 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-13 22:47 ` David Miller
2013-04-14 0:04 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14 0:16 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14 0:49 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14 5:16 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-14 0:00 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-14 10:52 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-14 13:07 ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-15 7:37 ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-15 16:56 ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-15 16:59 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-17 10:22 ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-19 21:51 ` [PATCH net-next v2] packet: " Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-20 12:33 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-21 2:30 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-21 10:10 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-21 16:42 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-21 18:14 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-04-22 8:19 ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-22 10:25 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2013-04-22 14:23 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-20 16:43 ` Richard Cochran
2013-04-21 2:34 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-15 15:41 ` [PATCH] net-packet: " Paul Chavent
2013-04-15 9:45 ` David Laight
2013-04-15 17:08 ` Willem de Bruijn
2013-04-15 17:31 ` David Miller
2013-04-15 7:31 ` Paul Chavent
2013-04-15 16:37 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51751018.2010305@redhat.com \
--to=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=Paul.Chavent@onera.fr \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).