netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] net/cpsw: don't continue if we miss to allocate rx skbs
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:11:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5176C7B9.2020004@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366738299-21285-3-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de>

On 4/23/2013 11:01 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> if during "ifconfig up" we run out of mem we continue regardless how
> many skbs we got. In worst case we have zero RX skbs and can't ever
> receive further packets since the RX skbs are never reallocated. If
> cpdma_chan_submit() fails we even leak the skb.
> This patch changes the behavior here:
> If we fail to allocate an skb during bring up we don't continue and
> report that error. Same goes for errors from cpdma_chan_submit().
> While here I changed to __netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align() so GFP_KERNEL can
> be used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c |   35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> index e2ba702..29700fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> @@ -867,6 +867,15 @@ static void cpsw_init_host_port(struct cpsw_priv *priv)
>   	}
>   }
>   
> +static void cpsw_slave_stop(struct cpsw_slave *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv)
> +{
> +	if (!slave->phy)
> +		return;
> +	phy_stop(slave->phy);
> +	phy_disconnect(slave->phy);
> +	slave->phy = NULL;
> +}
> +
>   static int cpsw_ndo_open(struct net_device *ndev)
>   {
>   	struct cpsw_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> @@ -912,14 +921,16 @@ static int cpsw_ndo_open(struct net_device *ndev)
>   			struct sk_buff *skb;
>   
>   			ret = -ENOMEM;
> -			skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(priv->ndev,
> -							priv->rx_packet_max);
> +			skb = __netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(priv->ndev,
> +					priv->rx_packet_max, GFP_KERNEL);
>   			if (!skb)
> -				break;
> +				goto err_cleanup;
>   			ret = cpdma_chan_submit(priv->rxch, skb, skb->data,
>   					skb_tailroom(skb), 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> -			if (WARN_ON(ret < 0))
> -				break;
> +			if (ret < 0) {
> +				kfree_skb(skb);
> +				goto err_cleanup;
> +			}
>   		}
>   		/* continue even if we didn't manage to submit all
>   		 * receive descs
> @@ -944,15 +955,13 @@ static int cpsw_ndo_open(struct net_device *ndev)
>   	if (priv->data.dual_emac)
>   		priv->slaves[priv->emac_port].open_stat = true;
>   	return 0;
> -}
>   
> -static void cpsw_slave_stop(struct cpsw_slave *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv)
> -{
> -	if (!slave->phy)
> -		return;
> -	phy_stop(slave->phy);
> -	phy_disconnect(slave->phy);
> -	slave->phy = NULL;
> +err_cleanup:
> +	cpdma_ctlr_stop(priv->dma);
> +	for_each_slave(priv, cpsw_slave_stop, priv);
> +	pm_runtime_put_sync(&priv->pdev->dev);
> +	netif_carrier_off(priv->ndev);
> +	return ret;
>   }
>   
>   static int cpsw_ndo_stop(struct net_device *ndev)
Acked-by: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>

Regards
Mugunthan V N

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-23 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-23 17:31 cpsw queue, v2 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-23 17:31 ` [PATCH 1/5] net/davinci_cpdma: don't check for jiffies with interrupts Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-23 17:31 ` [PATCH 2/5] net/cpsw: don't continue if we miss to allocate rx skbs Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-23 17:41   ` Mugunthan V N [this message]
2013-04-23 17:31 ` [PATCH 3/5] net/cpsw: don't rely only on netif_running() to check which device is active Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-23 17:41   ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-23 17:31 ` [PATCH 4/5] net/davinci_cpdma: remove unused argument in cpdma_chan_submit() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-23 17:31 ` [PATCH 5/5] net/cpsw: redo rx skb allocation in rx path Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-25  8:17 ` cpsw queue, v2 David Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-04-17 21:52 my small cpsw queue Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] net/cpsw: don't continue if we miss to allocate rx skbs Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:50   ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-18 12:09     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-19 10:40       ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22  8:05         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5176C7B9.2020004@ti.com \
    --to=mugunthanvnm@ti.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).