From: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
<tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] net/cpsw: don't continue if we miss to allocate rx skbs
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:11:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5176C7B9.2020004@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366738299-21285-3-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
On 4/23/2013 11:01 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> if during "ifconfig up" we run out of mem we continue regardless how
> many skbs we got. In worst case we have zero RX skbs and can't ever
> receive further packets since the RX skbs are never reallocated. If
> cpdma_chan_submit() fails we even leak the skb.
> This patch changes the behavior here:
> If we fail to allocate an skb during bring up we don't continue and
> report that error. Same goes for errors from cpdma_chan_submit().
> While here I changed to __netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align() so GFP_KERNEL can
> be used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> index e2ba702..29700fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> @@ -867,6 +867,15 @@ static void cpsw_init_host_port(struct cpsw_priv *priv)
> }
> }
>
> +static void cpsw_slave_stop(struct cpsw_slave *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv)
> +{
> + if (!slave->phy)
> + return;
> + phy_stop(slave->phy);
> + phy_disconnect(slave->phy);
> + slave->phy = NULL;
> +}
> +
> static int cpsw_ndo_open(struct net_device *ndev)
> {
> struct cpsw_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> @@ -912,14 +921,16 @@ static int cpsw_ndo_open(struct net_device *ndev)
> struct sk_buff *skb;
>
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> - skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(priv->ndev,
> - priv->rx_packet_max);
> + skb = __netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(priv->ndev,
> + priv->rx_packet_max, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!skb)
> - break;
> + goto err_cleanup;
> ret = cpdma_chan_submit(priv->rxch, skb, skb->data,
> skb_tailroom(skb), 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (WARN_ON(ret < 0))
> - break;
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + goto err_cleanup;
> + }
> }
> /* continue even if we didn't manage to submit all
> * receive descs
> @@ -944,15 +955,13 @@ static int cpsw_ndo_open(struct net_device *ndev)
> if (priv->data.dual_emac)
> priv->slaves[priv->emac_port].open_stat = true;
> return 0;
> -}
>
> -static void cpsw_slave_stop(struct cpsw_slave *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv)
> -{
> - if (!slave->phy)
> - return;
> - phy_stop(slave->phy);
> - phy_disconnect(slave->phy);
> - slave->phy = NULL;
> +err_cleanup:
> + cpdma_ctlr_stop(priv->dma);
> + for_each_slave(priv, cpsw_slave_stop, priv);
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(&priv->pdev->dev);
> + netif_carrier_off(priv->ndev);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int cpsw_ndo_stop(struct net_device *ndev)
Acked-by: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@ti.com>
Regards
Mugunthan V N
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-23 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-23 17:31 cpsw queue, v2 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-23 17:31 ` [PATCH 1/5] net/davinci_cpdma: don't check for jiffies with interrupts Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-23 17:31 ` [PATCH 2/5] net/cpsw: don't continue if we miss to allocate rx skbs Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-23 17:41 ` Mugunthan V N [this message]
2013-04-23 17:31 ` [PATCH 3/5] net/cpsw: don't rely only on netif_running() to check which device is active Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-23 17:41 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-23 17:31 ` [PATCH 4/5] net/davinci_cpdma: remove unused argument in cpdma_chan_submit() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-23 17:31 ` [PATCH 5/5] net/cpsw: redo rx skb allocation in rx path Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-25 8:17 ` cpsw queue, v2 David Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-04-17 21:52 my small cpsw queue Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-17 21:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] net/cpsw: don't continue if we miss to allocate rx skbs Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-18 11:50 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-18 12:09 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-04-19 10:40 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-04-22 8:05 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5176C7B9.2020004@ti.com \
--to=mugunthanvnm@ti.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).