Re: [PATCH net-next] net: fix address check in rtnl_fdb_del

[Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>]

On 04/23/2013 04:47 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 16:39 -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>> Commit 6681712d67eef14c4ce793561c3231659153a320
>> 	vxlan: generalize forwarding tables
>>
>> relaxed the address checks in rtnl_fdb_del() to use is_zero_ether_addr().
>> This allows users to add multicast addresses using the fdb API.  However,
>> the check in rtnl_fdb_del() still uses a more strict
>> is_valid_ether_addr() which rejects multicast addresses.  Thus it
>> is possible to add an fdb that can not be later removed.
>> Relax the check in rtnl_fdb_del() as well.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   net/core/rtnetlink.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>> index 18af08a..2c54cc1 100644
>> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
>> @@ -2192,7 +2192,7 @@ static int rtnl_fdb_del(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
>>   	}
>>
>>   	addr = nla_data(tb[NDA_LLADDR]);
>> -	if (!is_valid_ether_addr(addr)) {
>> +	if (!is_zero_ether_addr(addr)) {
>
> This is the opposite of what you want.

of course you are right....  totally forgot the '!'...

Thanks
-vlad
>
> Ben.
>
>>   		pr_info("PF_BRIDGE: RTM_DELNEIGH with invalid ether address\n");
>>   		return -EINVAL;
>>   	}
>