From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] ARM: net: bpf_jit: make code generation less dependent
 on struct sk_filter.
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 00:30:19 +0200
Message-ID: <517AFFFB.9090201@redhat.com>
References: <1366824429-26652-1-git-send-email-nschichan@freebox.fr> <1366824429-26652-3-git-send-email-nschichan@freebox.fr> <3592414.M8kQZLCXlW@wuerfel> <20130426122601.10ec05fcb4860df1b0a5b409@linux-foundation.org> <517AD9E2.2090704@redhat.com> <20130426130948.cbfd2f6256afc0e3ee7abeed@linux-foundation.org> <517AF926.3020302@redhat.com> <CAKU6vyYOZ-24TSyLa8t6Oipib37fE1gtvM8nWj2TDzVw-tv0jA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>,
	Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
	Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel.borkmann@tik.ee.ethz.ch>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKU6vyYOZ-24TSyLa8t6Oipib37fE1gtvM8nWj2TDzVw-tv0jA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On 04/27/2013 12:18 AM, Xi Wang wrote:
> Thanks for CCing.  One way to clean up this would be to refactor the
> bpf jit interface as:
>
>    bpf_func_t bpf_jit_compile(struct sock_filter *filter, unsigned int flen);
>    void bpf_jit_free(bpf_func_t bpf_func);
>
> Then both packet and seccomp filters can share the unified interface.
> Also, we don't need seccomp_filter_get_len() and other helpers.
>
> Do you want me to rebase my patch against linux-next and see how that goes?

Sure, whatever works for you. Not sure if it will still make it though.

Also, as Eric already mentioned earlier, please do not top-post your mails!
I think one reminder should be sufficient for that. ;-)