netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@freescale.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][net-next] gianfar: Fix reported sent bytes to BQL for Tx timestamping
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:27:32 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <517E8354.1010503@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367243593.8964.306.camel@edumazet-glaptop>

Hi,

Unfortunately fixing this the other way around would imply changes
in both xmit and clean_tx, and additional overhead in clean_tx.
On xmit skb->len gets incremented with FCB_LEN and/or TXPAL_LEN,
on a case by case basis. This would imply to add extra checks on
clean_tx to identify whether only FCB_LEN has been added, or
FCB+TXPAL or neither, all these just to report the bytes on wire
for BQL.
Does BQL really need to measure the bytes-on-wire or the bytes consumed
for buffering?

Thanks,
Claudiu

On 4/29/2013 4:53 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 15:57 +0300, Claudiu Manoil wrote:
>> When Tx timestamping is enabled the number of sent bytes reported
>> to BQL via tx_completed_queue() falls short by GMAC_FCB_LEN +
>> GMAC_TXPAL_LEN than the number of bytes reported via tx_sent_queue()
>> on xmit. This leads to BQL stopping transmission errorneously followed
>> by tx timeout firing.
>>
>> This fixes the amount of sent bytes reported to BQL on clean_tx_ring
>> to match the amount reported on xmit, when Tx timestamping enabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@freescale.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c
>> index 2375a01..0d26a8b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/gianfar.c
>> @@ -2539,6 +2539,7 @@ static void gfar_clean_tx_ring(struct gfar_priv_tx_q *tx_queue)
>>   			skb_tstamp_tx(skb, &shhwtstamps);
>>   			bdp->lstatus &= BD_LFLAG(TXBD_WRAP);
>>   			bdp = next;
>> +			bytes_sent += GMAC_FCB_LEN + GMAC_TXPAL_LEN;
>>   		}
>>
>>   		bdp->lstatus &= BD_LFLAG(TXBD_WRAP);
>
> Technically speaking these bytes are not sent to the wire.
>
> I would rather fix gfar_start_xmit() to give to netdev_tx_sent_queue()
> call the correct amount of bytes on wire, to be consistent with other
> drivers.
>
>
>
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-29 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-29 12:57 [PATCH][net-next] gianfar: Fix reported sent bytes to BQL for Tx timestamping Claudiu Manoil
2013-04-29 13:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-29 14:27   ` Claudiu Manoil [this message]
2013-04-29 15:23     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-29 15:28       ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-29 15:39         ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-29 15:42           ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-29 15:52         ` Claudiu Manoil
2013-04-29 15:59           ` Eric Dumazet
2013-08-30 12:01             ` [PATCH][net-next] gianfar: Fix reported number of sent bytes to BQL Claudiu Manoil
2013-09-03 18:59               ` Florian Fainelli
2013-09-03 19:18                 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-09-04  2:14               ` David Miller
2013-04-29 15:33       ` [PATCH][net-next] gianfar: Fix reported sent bytes to BQL for Tx timestamping Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=517E8354.1010503@freescale.com \
    --to=claudiu.manoil@freescale.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).