From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Duyck Subject: Re: [IPROUTE PATCH v2] iproute2: act_ipt fix xtables breakage on older versions. Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 10:18:21 -0700 Message-ID: <51814E5D.5030505@intel.com> References: <20130429154644.52016.60284.stgit@ahduyck-cp1.jf.intel.com> <517FC04E.30705@mojatatu.com> <517FEC48.80700@intel.com> <51811D06.2070800@mojatatu.com> <518124D3.8070800@mojatatu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: shemminger@vyatta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, Hasan Chowdhury , Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Jamal Hadi Salim Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:39527 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751051Ab3EARSW (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 May 2013 13:18:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <518124D3.8070800@mojatatu.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/01/2013 07:21 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > On 13-05-01 09:47 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: >> Hi Alex, >> > >> So now i am wondering how the FSCK this thing even compiled. > > Mystery solved. Man, this idea of keeping up with the distros and > iptables variants is a little insane. > Debian's setup ends up using m_ipt.c for anything less than iptable > 1.4.11. Kudos to the debian iproute maintainer. > Fedora on the other hand seems to going to m_xt.c > (This is why i asked for your Config earlier). > In any case, your patch is correct. So i will go sign off on it; > its just nobody else had to deal with that (or reported it). > > Thanks for your patience Alex. > > cheers, > jamal > No problem. Just glad to have that patch off of my backlog of things to get upstream. Thanks, Alex