netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] PCI: Make sure VF's driver get attached after PF's
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 14:39:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5192AEF4.1070905@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQVGGHB_amKw0-DfDifpTnRGPbxA+q3WY5F-O3x-sx386A@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/14/2013 12:59 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Alexander Duyck
> <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 05/14/2013 11:44 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Alexander Duyck
>>> <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> I'm sorry, but what is the point of this patch?  With device assignment
>>>> it is always possible to have VFs loaded and the PF driver unloaded
>>>> since you cannot remove the VFs if they are assigned to a VM.
>>> unload PF driver will not call pci_disable_sriov?
>> You cannot call pci_disable_sriov because you will panic all of the
>> guests that have devices assigned.
> ixgbe_remove did call pci_disable_sriov...
>
> for guest panic, that is another problem.
> just like you pci passthrough with real pci device and hotremove the
> card in host.
>
> ...

I suggest you take another look.  In ixgbe_disable_sriov, which is the
function that is called we do a check for assigned VFs.  If they are
assigned then we do not call pci_disable_sriov.

>
>> So how does your patch actually fix this problem?  It seems like it is
>> just avoiding it.
> yes, until the first one is done.

Avoiding the issue doesn't fix the underlying problem and instead you
are likely just introducing more bugs as a result.

>> From what I can tell your problem is originating in pci_call_probe.  I
>> believe it is calling work_on_cpu and that doesn't seem correct since
>> the work should be taking place on a CPU already local to the PF. You
>> might want to look there to see why you are trying to schedule work on a
>> CPU which should be perfectly fine for you to already be doing your work on.
> it always try to go with local cpu with same pxm.

The problem is we really shouldn't be calling work_for_cpu in this case
since we are already on the correct CPU.  What probably should be
happening is that pci_call_probe should be doing a check to see if the
current CPU is already contained within the device node map and if so
just call local_pci_probe directly.  That way you can avoid deadlocking
the system by trying to flush the CPU queue of the CPU you are currently on.

Thanks,

Alex

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-14 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1368498506-25857-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
2013-05-14  2:28 ` [PATCH 6/7] PCI: Make sure VF's driver get attached after PF's Yinghai Lu
2013-05-14  8:58   ` Yan Burman
2013-05-14 15:43     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-05-16  4:00       ` Or Gerlitz
2013-05-16  4:39         ` Yinghai Lu
2013-05-16  4:56           ` Or Gerlitz
2013-05-16 17:53             ` Tejun Heo
2013-05-16 18:36               ` Yinghai Lu
2013-05-20 12:23                 ` Or Gerlitz
2013-05-14  9:46   ` Perla, Sathya
2013-05-14 15:19     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-05-14 16:00   ` Alexander Duyck
2013-05-14 18:44     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-05-14 19:45       ` Alexander Duyck
2013-05-14 19:59         ` Yinghai Lu
2013-05-14 21:39           ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2013-05-21 21:30             ` Don Dutile
2013-05-21 21:31               ` Don Dutile
2013-05-21 21:58                 ` Alexander Duyck
2013-05-21 22:09                   ` Don Dutile
2013-05-21 22:12                     ` Alexander Duyck
2013-05-21 21:49               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-21 22:01                 ` Alexander Duyck
2013-05-21 22:11                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-05-21 22:30                     ` Alexander Duyck
2013-05-22 20:16                       ` Or Gerlitz
2013-05-22 21:40                         ` Don Dutile
2013-05-23  6:43                           ` Or Gerlitz
2013-05-22 23:45                         ` Ben Hutchings
2013-05-23  6:32                           ` Or Gerlitz
2013-05-16  6:39   ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5192AEF4.1070905@intel.com \
    --to=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).