From: dingtianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: add synchronize_net() after netdev_rx_handler_unregister
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 15:50:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <519DCA56.9020509@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369273937.3301.377.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
On 2013/5/23 9:52, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 09:41 +0800, dingtianhong wrote:
>
>> I totally understand the commit [1] and know the problem that you met at that time,
>> but its not a net core problem, its drivers problem, the function synchronize_net()
>> need to follow netdev_rx_handler_unregister() even though netdev_rx_handler_unregister()
>> has its own synchronize_net(), the commit [2] fcd99434f fix drivers problem follow your
>> opinion, but miss synchronize_net(),so add it.
>>
>
> No, driver is fine.
>
> You absolutely not explained why you believe this is needed.
>
> After netdev_rx_handler_unregister(), no packet will be delivered to the
> bonding driver.
>
>
ok, I agree with the views of yours, it is no way to access the rx_handler_data after that.
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-23 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-22 8:42 [PATCH] bonding: add synchronize_net() after netdev_rx_handler_unregister dingtianhong
2013-05-22 11:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-23 1:41 ` dingtianhong
2013-05-23 1:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-23 7:50 ` dingtianhong [this message]
2013-05-22 18:30 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-05-23 1:43 ` dingtianhong
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-05-23 1:57 dingtianhong
2013-05-23 2:04 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=519DCA56.9020509@huawei.com \
--to=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).