From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [Patch v2] skbuff: Hide GFP_ATOMIC page allocation failures for dropped packets Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 13:39:11 -0400 Message-ID: <51A39A3F.8080903@redhat.com> References: <1369599557-22677-1-git-send-email-atomlin@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pshelar@nicira.com, mst@redhat.com, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, aquini@redhat.com, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: atomlin@redhat.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1369599557-22677-1-git-send-email-atomlin@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 05/26/2013 04:19 PM, atomlin@redhat.com wrote: > From: Aaron Tomlin > > Since v1: > - Removed unnecessary parentheses > > ---8<--- > > Failed GFP_ATOMIC allocations by the network stack result in dropped > packets, which will be received on a subsequent retransmit, and an > unnecessary, noisy warning with a kernel backtrace. > > These warnings are harmless, but they still cause users to panic and > file bug reports over dropped packets. It would be better to hide the > failed allocation warnings and backtraces, and let retransmits handle > dropped packets quietly. Yes please. Getting memory management bug reports for dropped network packets got old years ago. Lets get rid of those messages. > Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel