From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eliezer Tamir Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 1/5] net: add napi_id and hash Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 16:41:08 +0300 Message-ID: <51A4B3F4.9000006@linux.intel.com> References: <20130527074351.29882.51106.stgit@ladj378.jer.intel.com> <20130527074401.29882.98135.stgit@ladj378.jer.intel.com> <1369700905.3301.499.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <51A464B9.5080106@linux.intel.com> <1369748280.3301.534.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dave Miller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Brandeburg , Don Skidmore , e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Willem de Bruijn , Andi Kleen , HPA , Eilon Greenstien , Or Gerlitz , Alex Rosenbaum , Eliezer Tamir To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1369748280.3301.534.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 28/05/2013 16:38, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 11:03 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote: > >> With an atomic we don't need the RTNL in any of the napi_id functions. >> One less thing to worry about when we try to remove the RTNL. > > OK but we'll need something to protect the lists against concurrent > insert/deletes. > > A spinlock or a mutex. OK