From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [Patch v2] skbuff: Hide GFP_ATOMIC page allocation failures for dropped packets Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 17:30:02 -0400 Message-ID: <51A521DA.2080206@redhat.com> References: <1369601101-23057-1-git-send-email-atomlin@redhat.com> <20130527224149.GA4384@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: atomlin@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pshelar@nicira.com, mst@redhat.com, alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, aquini@redhat.com, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Francois Romieu Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130527224149.GA4384@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 05/27/2013 06:41 PM, Francois Romieu wrote: > atomlin@redhat.com : > [...] >> Failed GFP_ATOMIC allocations by the network stack result in dropped >> packets, which will be received on a subsequent retransmit, and an >> unnecessary, noisy warning with a kernel backtrace. >> >> These warnings are harmless, but they still cause users to panic and >> file bug reports over dropped packets. It would be better to hide the >> failed allocation warnings and backtraces, and let retransmits handle >> dropped packets quietly. > > Linux VM may be perfect but device drivers do stupid things. > > Please don't paper over it just because some shit ends in your backyard. It is impossible to free memory at the speed at which 10Gbit network packets can come in. Dropped packets are a reality. The network stack already has statistics counters to keep track of dropped packets. There is absolutely no reason to print out an entire kernel backtrace for dropped network packets. All that achieves is get people to file bug reports, which nothing can be done about. Oh, and distract them from whatever issue as causing their actual problem, and delay them fixing what was going on.