From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>,
<ying.xue@windriver.com>, <erik.hugne@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/12] tipc: Add "max_ports" configuration parameter
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 13:48:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51A8E288.9020206@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130530.154925.298481337221579707.davem@davemloft.net>
On 13-05-30 06:49 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 15:36:07 -0400
>
>> From: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com>
>>
>> Introduce the "max_ports" module parameter, which allows the maximum
>> number of ports supported by TIPC to be changed from the default value
>> at boot, or at module load time. Because of the way the port reference
>> table is structured and initiated, this value must be known at module
>> start time, and can not be changed later.
>>
>> Until now this value has been set via a macro, and hence things
>> have to be recompiled if the value is to be changed. The Kconfig
>> knob and the dead code intended to change this parameter at runtime
>> are dropped.
>>
>> Considering TIPC node addresses are unique on the entire node, the
>> 64k port limit has proven to be a little too strict. We increase the
>> allowed max to 128k. This is safe since the protocol headers allow
>> for up to 2^32 -1 ports.
>>
>> Usage for module: "insmod tipc.ko max_ports=<value>" ; at boot, append
>> "tipc.max_ports=<value>" to the kernel command line.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Erik Hugne <erik.hugne@ericsson.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
>
> View compile time constants and module parameters as artificial
> limits, they are terrible and unnecessary.
I can't argue with that; I was thinking that the module param was
better than a recompile, but as you say, not having it at all is
yet better again. I'll drop this patch, and if the reimplementation
isn't ready before 3.10-rc6, I'll just resend the series without it.
Thanks,
Paul.
--
>
> There is no reason you cannot restructure this table so that you
> can dynamically size it at run time.
>
> Please reimplement it in that way.
>
> Thanks.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-31 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-30 19:36 [PATCH net-next 00/12] tipc: make use of kernel threads to simplify things Paul Gortmaker
2013-05-30 19:36 ` [PATCH net-next 01/12] tipc: change socket buffer overflow control to respect sk_rcvbuf Paul Gortmaker
2013-05-31 13:36 ` Neil Horman
2013-06-03 9:55 ` Ying Xue
2013-06-03 13:16 ` Neil Horman
2013-06-04 1:37 ` Ying Xue
2013-06-04 13:40 ` Neil Horman
2013-05-30 19:36 ` [PATCH net-next 02/12] tipc: Add "max_ports" configuration parameter Paul Gortmaker
2013-05-30 22:49 ` David Miller
2013-05-31 8:25 ` Erik Hugne
2013-05-31 8:29 ` David Miller
2013-05-31 8:34 ` Erik Hugne
2013-05-31 8:40 ` David Miller
2013-05-31 9:23 ` Erik Hugne
2013-05-31 9:25 ` David Laight
2013-05-31 9:26 ` David Miller
2013-05-31 9:06 ` David Laight
2013-05-31 17:48 ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2013-05-30 19:36 ` [PATCH net-next 03/12] tipc: allow implicit connect for stream sockets Paul Gortmaker
2013-05-30 19:36 ` [PATCH net-next 04/12] tipc: introduce new TIPC server infrastructure Paul Gortmaker
2013-05-30 19:36 ` [PATCH net-next 05/12] tipc: convert topology server to use new server facility Paul Gortmaker
2013-05-30 19:36 ` [PATCH net-next 06/12] tipc: convert configuration " Paul Gortmaker
2013-05-30 19:36 ` [PATCH net-next 07/12] tipc: delete code orphaned by new server infrastructure Paul Gortmaker
2013-05-30 19:36 ` [PATCH net-next 08/12] tipc: remove user_port instance from tipc_port structure Paul Gortmaker
2013-05-30 19:36 ` [PATCH net-next 09/12] tipc: rename tipc_createport_raw to tipc_createport Paul Gortmaker
2013-05-30 19:36 ` [PATCH net-next 10/12] tipc: convert config_lock from spinlock to mutex Paul Gortmaker
2013-05-30 19:36 ` [PATCH net-next 11/12] tipc: save sock structure pointer instead of void pointer to tipc_port Paul Gortmaker
2013-05-30 19:36 ` [PATCH net-next 12/12] tipc: cosmetic realignment of function arguments Paul Gortmaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51A8E288.9020206@windriver.com \
--to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=erik.hugne@ericsson.com \
--cc=jon.maloy@ericsson.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ying.xue@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).