From: Alan Robertson <alanr@unix.sh>
To: vyasevic@redhat.com
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@gavemloft.net,
kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] rtnetlink: ndo_dflt_fdb_del() never works
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:40:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51AD0D5B.1010001@unix.sh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130531.164225.1568293418016521543.davem@davemloft.net>
I'd like to fix this problem - but it seems good to answer David
Miller's question before we decide which way to go. I certainly don't
know the answer...
I can do (1) and (2), but I'm not sure how to do (3) properly.
Vlad: Can you help out here?
On 05/31/2013 05:42 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 13:11:47 -0400
>
<snip>
>> The test is there to support simultaneous master and self
>> operations. The operation on a master may not always require a
>> NUD_PERMANENT state (ex: bridge) and we don't want to perform self
>> operations in that instance.
> I still don't understand the ndm_state check. Please use different
> words to explain it so that even an idiot like me can understand.
>
> Once we define what the check should exactly be I propose:
>
> 1) Keeping the check only in add()
>
> 2) Removing the state checks completely in del()
>
> 3) Validating at netdevice registry time or elsewhere that these
> default fdb ops are always used together. That wraps up everything
> to ensure that only doing the check in add() is provably correct.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Alan Robertson <alanr@unix.sh> - @OSSAlanR
"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me claim from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William Wilberforce
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-03 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-30 22:01 [PATCH net] rtnetlink: ndo_dflt_fdb_del() never works Alan Robertson
2013-05-31 8:46 ` David Miller
2013-05-31 16:43 ` Alan Robertson
2013-05-31 17:11 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-05-31 19:59 ` Alan Robertson
2013-05-31 23:42 ` David Miller
2013-06-03 21:40 ` Alan Robertson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51AD0D5B.1010001@unix.sh \
--to=alanr@unix.sh \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=davem@gavemloft.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vyasevic@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).