From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amir Vadai Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Low latency Socket support Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:31:26 +0300 Message-ID: <51BEF38E.1060503@mellanox.com> References: <1371466703-3370-1-git-send-email-amirv@mellanox.com> <51BEF19C.5050908@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , , "Or Gerlitz" , Amir Ancel , "Yevgeny Petrilin" , Yaniv Saar To: Eliezer Tamir Return-path: Received: from eu1sys200aog116.obsmtp.com ([207.126.144.141]:56299 "EHLO eu1sys200aog116.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932390Ab3FQLck (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Jun 2013 07:32:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <51BEF19C.5050908@linux.intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 17/06/2013 14:23, Eliezer Tamir wrote: > On 17/06/2013 13:58, Amir Vadai wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >> Please pull those 2 patches, which add support in Low Latency Socket >> (LLS) to >> mlx4_en. >> >> Thanks, >> Amir > > I would really like to hear some of your performance numbers. > > -Eliezer I will see what numbers I can share. In general latency of both TCP/UDP, recvmsg only, single stream, improved in ~50% and no bad impact on BW. We're trying to find a solution to the epoll issue, and will share our findings with netdev as soon as we have ones. Amir