netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Narendra_K@Dell.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bhutchings@solarflare.com,
	john.r.fastabend@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Add phys_port identifier to struct net_device and export it to sysfs
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:47:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51BF59D8.10806@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130617181004.GA1364@fedora-17-guest.dell.com>

On 06/17/2013 11:10 AM, Narendra_K@Dell.com wrote:
> It is useful to know if network interfaces from NIC partitions
> 'map to/use the' same physical port. For example,  when creating
> bonding in fault tolerance mode, if  two network interfaces map to/use
> the same physical port, it might not have the desired result. This
> information is not available today in a standard format or it is not
> present.  If this information can be made available in a generic  way
> to user space, tools such as NetworkManager or Libteam or Wicked can
> make smarter bonding decisions (such as warn users when setting up
> configurations which will not have desired effect).
>
> The requirement is to have a generic interface using which
> kernel/drivers can provide information/hints to user space about the
> physical port number used by a network interface.
>
> The following options were explored -
>
> 1. 'dev_id' sysfs attribute:
>
> In addition to being used to differentiate between devices that share
> the same link layer address, it is being used to indicate the physical
> port number used by a network interface.
>
> As dev_id exists to differentiate between devices sharing the same
> link layer address, dev_id option is not selected.
>
> 2. Re-using 'if_port' field in 'struct net_device':
>
> if_port field exists to indicate the media type(please refer to
> netdevice.h). It seemed like it was also used to indicate the physical
> port number.
>
> As re-using 'if_port' might possibly break user space, this option is
> not selected.
>
> 3. Add a new field 'phys_port' to 'struct net_device' and export it
> to sysfs:
>
> The 'phys_port' will be a universally unique identifier, which
> would be a MAC-48 or EUI-64 or a 128 bit UUID value, but not
> restricted to these spaces. It will uniquely identify the physical
> port used by a network interface. The 'length' of the identifier will
> be zero if the field is not set for a network interface.
>
> This patch implements option 3. It creates a new sysfs attribute
> 'phys_port' -
>
> /sys/class/net/<interface name>/phys_port
>
> References: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=136920998009209&w=2
> References: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=136992041432498&w=2
>
> Signed-off-by: Narendra K <narendra_k@dell.com>
> ---
> Changes from RFC version:
>
> Suggestions from Ben Hutchings -
> 1. 'struct port_identifier' is changed to be generic instead of
> restricting it to MAC-48 or EUI-64 or 128 bit UUID.
> 2. Commit message updated to indicate point 1.
> 3. 'show_phys_port' function modified to handle zero length
> instead of returning -EINVAL
> 4. 'show_phys_port' function made generic to handle all
> lengths instead 6, 8 or 16 bytes.
>
> Hi Ben, I have retained the commit message to indicate that 'dev_id'
> is being used to indicate the physical port number also.
>
> Thank you.
>
>   include/linux/netdevice.h | 13 +++++++++++++
>   net/core/net-sysfs.c      | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)

[...]

> --- a/net/core/net-sysfs.c
> +++ b/net/core/net-sysfs.c
> @@ -334,6 +334,22 @@ static ssize_t store_group(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>   	return netdev_store(dev, attr, buf, len, change_group);
>   }
>

Is there some missing locking here?

> +static ssize_t show_phys_port(struct device *dev,
> +			      struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> +	struct net_device *net = to_net_dev(dev);
> +	unsigned char len;
> +

         read_lock(&dev_base_lock);
> +	if (!dev_isalive(net))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	len = net->phys_port.port_id_len;
> +	if (!len)
> +		return 0;

	ret = sysfs_format_mac(buf, net->phys_port.port_id, len);
	read_unlock(&dev_base_lock);

	return ret;
}

Please take a look maybe I missed something.

Thanks,
John

-- 
John Fastabend         Intel Corporation

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-17 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-17 18:10 [PATCH net-next] net: Add phys_port identifier to struct net_device and export it to sysfs Narendra_K
2013-06-17 18:47 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2013-06-19 14:29   ` Narendra_K
2013-06-19 15:36     ` Ben Hutchings
2013-06-19 18:53       ` Narendra_K
2013-06-19 19:34         ` Ben Hutchings
2013-06-19 21:37           ` Praveen_Paladugu
2013-06-21 17:11           ` John Fastabend
2013-06-25 17:33             ` Narendra_K
2013-06-28 16:33               ` John Fastabend
2013-06-28 17:09                 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-07-02 14:40                   ` Narendra_K
2013-07-11 20:39 ` Jiri Pirko
2013-07-15 15:34   ` Narendra_K
2013-07-21  5:55     ` Or Gerlitz
2013-07-21  7:24       ` Jiri Pirko
2013-07-21 11:14         ` Or Gerlitz
2013-07-21 14:48           ` Ben Hutchings
2013-07-21 20:29             ` Or Gerlitz
2013-07-21 20:50               ` Ben Hutchings
2013-07-22 11:46             ` Narendra_K
2013-07-22 11:49               ` Jiri Pirko
2013-07-22 15:48                 ` Or Gerlitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51BF59D8.10806@gmail.com \
    --to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=Narendra_K@Dell.com \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=john.r.fastabend@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).